RE: [ActiveDir] Delegation of privilege

2005-07-19 Thread Dan Holme
This may be a rotten answer or a perfect answer Check out TWEAKUI for Windows XP. Its ACCESS CONTROL section gives you UI ability to change very specific activities permissions, e.g. creating a share, etc. You might try it (in a lab, first of course) as far as how it works on 2003 for the

RE: [ActiveDir] User with LDAP userPassword permissions

2005-07-19 Thread Dan Holme
I didnt see any responses to this dont know if I missed an answer but you should be able to ACL the Write permission to the userPassword property to any account you want and youre right to do it to a limited account, although Id be concerned about ANY code that could be accessed and

RE: [ActiveDir] Issues with newly built w2k3 DCs - update

2005-07-19 Thread Ruston, Neil
In fact the root cause of this issue is/was objects with a NULL security descriptor. The newly built DCs would not replicate in these objects and so replication stalled, AD was not available, ADI zones were not available etc etc. We executed sdprop on all DCs in the domain and 'fixed' the

[ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant Servers..

2005-07-19 Thread Frank Abagnale
Hi all, Having read a few recent mails regarding server imaging, it's interesting to hear how 'easy' it has been for those who have responded. I have been having difficulties trying to create an image, I will explain further... I have 10xHP Proliant 380's G4, to save time I thought I would

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant Servers..

2005-07-19 Thread Jeremy Waldrop
Just pull one of the drives out, put it in your other server and let the RAID 1 rebuild. Jeremy Waldrop Systems Engineer 4Front Systems, Inc.860 Aviation Parkway Morrisville NC 27560Main Line: (919)653-4400 Support Line: (919) 653- Web: http://www.4frontsystems.comemail:[EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] GC availability issue?

2005-07-19 Thread Burkes, Jeremy [Contractor]
Tony, Thanks for the response. All subnets are configured correctly in Active Directory and all workstations are correctly identifying what site they are suppose to be in. DNS settings are also correct. In sniffing the traffic I forgot to mention that even though the machine knows what

RE: [ActiveDir] GC availability issue?

2005-07-19 Thread Burkes, Jeremy [Contractor]
Aric, Thank you for the response. Yes all 9 sites are configured correctly with the correct subnets in Active Directory. This network topology has not changed in years and these are physically separate sites. The clients in question definitely are in the correct subnet associated with

RE: [ActiveDir] GC availability issue?

2005-07-19 Thread Burkes, Jeremy [Contractor]
Sakari, I am not sure what non-DC-related reasons we could necessarily have. We have 9 sites across the continental US with some having slow links (fractional T-1s). We put in site configuration because we wanted to make sure clients used the local DCs for directory services unless those

RE: [ActiveDir] Delegation of privilege

2005-07-19 Thread TIROA YANN
Ok, Thanks Sakari and Dan for your answers :) I will test TWEAKUI for Windows XP. But in fact, my need is rather giving a user server op, or equivalent privilege, for only *one DC* and not the whole DCs of my Domain. Last question: Whereall the privileges are defined for built-in

[ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Harding, Devon
How can I run a batch file logon script to map a drive and install an application on a user's PC as an Administrator? I don't want to expose the password using 'run as' Devon Harding Windows Systems Engineer Southern Wine Spirits - BSG 954-602-2469 -

Re: [ActiveDir] Delegation of privilege

2005-07-19 Thread Mark Parris
Search microsoft.com for secdefs.doc The document is Default access control settings in Windows Server 2003 Mark -Original Message- From: TIROA YANN [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:03:40 To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Delegation of privilege

RE: [ActiveDir] Delegation of privilege

2005-07-19 Thread Francis Ouellet
Hi Mark, You might want to have a look at the Active Directory Delegation Best Practices document available from MS @ http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=631747a3-79e1-48fa-9730-dae7c0a1d6d3DisplayLang=en Might not answer you question directly but it's an awesome primer

Re: [ActiveDir] Delegation of privilege

2005-07-19 Thread Mark Parris
Yes that's a good document, one of Sanjay's best pieces of work. The best bit for me was the custom delegwiz.inf in appendicies, which I have managed extend now to include create mailbox, delete mailbox etc etc.. Mark -Original Message- From: Francis Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Za Vue
Software installation from GPO works like a charm. Z.V. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:10 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights How can I

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Harding, Devon
Unfortunately, this software is not a .msi format. Can this still be installed via GPO? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za Vue Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:09 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Za Vue
Make an .MSI out of it. There is a free tool (LE WinInstaller) that is on the OS CD. -Z.V -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:17 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Logon

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Jeremy Waldrop
ScriptLogic lets you run login scripts as an administrator -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:17 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant Servers..

2005-07-19 Thread Phillip Partipilo
Try adding the controller's dos aspi driver to the root directory of the ghost boot floppy then add a line to the config.sys "device=mydriver.sys" without quotes of course. That is a little weird though. If the scsicontroller is properly grabbing int13 then its strange that ghost isn't

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread TIROA YANN
Hi, So u may generate a .msi with SWIADMLE.MSI free soft that is provided with windows 2000 CD. In \VALUEADD\3RDPARTY\MGMT\WINSTLE . It does a snapshot before and after, and will create a .msi, so u can distribute it with GPOs. Cheers, Yann -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Quatro Info
If that doesnt work. Check these links. For explanation mapping drive scripts: http://www.wown.com/articles_tutorials/Logon-Scripts-Pure-Mixed-Active-Directory-Environments.html For VBS installation scripts on clients http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter/scripts/apps/user/default.mspx

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Al Garrett
Use the ZAP format. See KB 231747 below http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;231747 -Original Message- From: Harding, Devon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 7:17 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Rick Kingslan
Al, One of the problems with the .ZAP format - it only executes the underlying program for install - but cannot be executed with elevated privliges as it is run under the user's context. .MSI is much better, but is not easy to create them correctly and effectively without some experience and

Re: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Peter Jessop
There is simple way of doing this that works if a) the .exe has a quiet option (-q for example) with no gui output b) it is not necessary to install the program from a logon script Simply install the program from another machine using psexec.exe i.e logon remote machine with sufficient

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Dan Holme
I don't know what your budget might be, but a couple of my clients use TQCRunAs by Quimeras (www.quimeras.com) for this kind of thing... this tool lets you encapsulate a secondary logon, the credentials for that logon, and a command in an encrypted .exe, which you could then use in a logon script.

RE: [ActiveDir] Does a domain require a GC?

2005-07-19 Thread Ken Cornetet
I don't understand your comment about converting universal groups to local groups. Can you explain what you mean here? Your suggestion about moving the root DCs to a separate site would work, but it would require me to set up a dedicated IP subnet at the two different locations where the

RE: [ActiveDir] User with LDAP userPassword permissions

2005-07-19 Thread Matt Brown
Worked perfectly, thanks. Thanks, -- Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]Consultant for Student Technology Feewebsite: http://techfee.ewu.edu/+--+| 509.359.6972 ph. - 509.359.7087 fx| 307 MONROE HALL | Cheney, WA 99004+--+

RE: [ActiveDir] Does a domain require a GC?

2005-07-19 Thread Dean Wells
Since the complete list of members within any Universal Group is known only to a GC and because Universal Groups can be converted to Domain Local groups, it is necessary to ensure that the conversion does not inadvertently remove members that exist in a domain other than that of the group

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Harding, Devon
This installation also needs to be run from mapped drive. I would really like to run this in GPO via VB Script. If anyone knows the best way to this, lemme know. -Devon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Jessop Sent: Tuesday, July

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Crawford, Scott
If you use a startup script, it will run as local system and be able to fully install. If, however, it NEEDS to be run as a user, this won't work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harding, Devon Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:10 AM To:

[ActiveDir] Resource unavailable temporarily

2005-07-19 Thread Mayuresh Kshirsagar
I am connecting to an Active Directory Server, using a Meta Directory server. But while performing a base level it fails with error Schema search for 'attributeTypes' ERROR='Resource temporarily unavailable' Any clues as to how can I debug this problem? Thanks, Mayuresh. List info :

Re: [ActiveDir] Resource unavailable temporarily

2005-07-19 Thread Mayuresh Kshirsagar
Also when I perform various operations to AD using tools like ldp, or a perl script, they are performed successfully. - Original Message - From: Mayuresh Kshirsagar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 11:15 PM Subject: Resource unavailable

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant Servers..

2005-07-19 Thread Brett Shirley
Phillip, doesn't the below imply that you're ghosting a DC? Phillip, isn't that stricktly verbotten? Frank, yes, it's strickly forbidden to ghost a DC. Cheers, -B On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Phillip Partipilo wrote: Try adding the controller's dos aspi driver to the root directory of the ghost

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Rick Kingslan
One caveat to this - if you are going to be accessing a network resource, the default behavior is NOT to wait for the network stack to be initialized before completing computer startup. The obvious problem of not being able to AuthN the user or the computer against AD is handled via cached

Re: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of AD changes similar to what Quest/NetPro use

2005-07-19 Thread Chuck Chopp
joe wrote: Ah I ran into your posts in the newsgroups. I responded some there. To further some of the info given previously, it is possible that some sort of LSASS injection is being used in one or more products, however, that doesn't mean this is a supported mechanism. Doing so *could* put

RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of AD changes similar to what Quest/NetPro use

2005-07-19 Thread Isenhour, Joseph
WMI Actually has an asynronous call that you can use to monitor specific objects. It will notify you when the object changes and what the original and new values are. Adam Lissoir wrote some scripts that demonstrate this. I think these links still work: http://www.LissWare.Net See Sample

RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of AD changes similar to what Quest/NetPro use

2005-07-19 Thread Isenhour, Joseph
Oops. I meant Alain Lissoir. Sorry Alain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 11:17 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of AD changes similar to

RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of AD changes similar to what Quest/NetPro use

2005-07-19 Thread Alain Lissoir
I just want to stress the fact that WMI is not an auditing technology per se. All what WMI does is polling AD for changes at regular intervals. Based on WQL query and changes, it notifies the WMI consumer that there was a change. No auditing information is available out of WMI. Windows Auditing

RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of AD changes similar to what Quest/NetPro use

2005-07-19 Thread Rick Kingslan
Small correction - Alain, not Adam. Unless, however, there is another WMI Guru out there with the surname Lissoir that I'm not aware of. Anything is possible, I suspect. ;o) Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph Sent:

RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of AD changes similar to what Quest/NetPro use

2005-07-19 Thread Isenhour, Joseph
I always assumed that the WMI call is using DirSynch under the covers. That seemed to me to be the only way it would be able to accomplish the notifications. It's good to know that that is not the case. Thanks Alain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ActiveDir] Default Domain

2005-07-19 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
Has anyone tried this? I got it off of another list I am a part of. The default domain name is stored in the DefaultDomainName registry value, but no built-in Group Policy setting to control its value. You can easily create a custom .adm file that will let you configure the default domain for

RE: [ActiveDir] Default Domain

2005-07-19 Thread Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
not tried it myself, but it should work as I know Quest DMW does this (setting a different default domain) when migrating computers Cheers, #JORGE# From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Tue 7/19/2005 10:03 PM To:

RE: [ActiveDir] Default Domain

2005-07-19 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
should work just like setting any other registry key on the client. The question is, if you really need it/want it. Most computer migration tools can set that value during the migration of the PC from source to target. But you might very well not want to change this value at the time of the

RE: [ActiveDir] Default Domain

2005-07-19 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
I am actually thinking of using it since I have 7 domains in one forest, if someone from a different domain uses someones computer, on reboot the domain that is selected in the drop down list is the proper domain for that computer. Similar to when my helpdesk people login to the local machine,

RE: [ActiveDir] Default Domain

2005-07-19 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
got ya - makes sense in this case. however, you could also edjucate users to logon via UPN thus not requiring the selection of a domain at all, regardless of the domain-affiliation of the PC used during logon... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant Servers..

2005-07-19 Thread Phillip Partipilo
Oh yeah. my brain is elsewhere. Doh! Phillip Partipilo Parametric Solutions Inc. Jupiter, Florida (561) 747-6107 - Original Message - From: Brett Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:54 PM Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Grillenmeier, Guido
well, I could think of many more drawbacks using this option... don't get me wrong - psexec is cool. But I don't really see it as an option to deploy software to many clients of which usually a certain percentage is remotely connected or offline. So you'd have to build your own little framework

RE: [ActiveDir] Logon script with Admin rights

2005-07-19 Thread Quatro Info
http://www.acronis.com/enterprise/products/snapdeploy/ Might be an option Grtz J -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Grillenmeier, Guido Verzonden: woensdag 20 juli 2005 0:02 Aan: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Onderwerp: RE: [ActiveDir]

RE: [ActiveDir] Default Domain

2005-07-19 Thread James_Day
We are using a startup script that has two reg add commands reg add HKLM\software\microsoft\windows nt\currentversion\winlogon /v altdefaultdomainname /t REG_SZ /d DOMAINAME /f reg add HKLM\software\microsoft\windows nt\currentversion\winlogon /v defaultdomainname /t REG_SZ /d DOMAINAME /f

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant Servers..

2005-07-19 Thread Brian Desmond
You have multiple problems here: The SmartArray card has no RAID config. The default varies though my experience is it RAID5s the first four drives and shuts down the remaining two in a DL380G4. Ghost likely does not have a driver enabling it to see the scsi disk. You will need to

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant Servers..

2005-07-19 Thread Quatro Info
Ami i missing something here? Ghost and RAIDGhost is not compatible with computers that use RAID. That is, Symantec Ghost 8.x and earlier, and Norton Ghost 2003 and earlier, do not support RAID controllers on computers that are being imaged. In addition:

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant Servers..

2005-07-19 Thread Quatro Info
in addition: Ghost 9.0 supports only raid 0 (stripe) and raid 5 (stripe sets with parity) Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Quatro InfoVerzonden: woensdag 20 juli 2005 2:38Aan: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgOnderwerp: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Ghost Imaging HP Proliant

RE: [ActiveDir] Default Domain

2005-07-19 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
---BeginMessage--- I too have seen this and can reproduce it over and over. After we migrate a PC from our NT4 domains to AD, Quest DMW sets the default domain to our AD domain. However if the user hits ctrl-alt-del to logon and then ESC and then CTRL-ALT-DEL again, the default domain is set

RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of AD changes similar to what Quest/NetPro use

2005-07-19 Thread Alain Lissoir
No. It doesn't use DIRSYNC. To be honest, I would like, but that is another story. Just a question of priority among the millions of things to do in WMI ... :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Programmatic auditing of

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: [ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered and

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: [ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered and

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: [ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered and

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: [ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered and

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: [ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered and

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: [ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered and

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: [ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered and

[ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered

2005-07-19 Thread ssanders
--- Attention: Non-Delivery Report --- This report is generated by the email server at: ivytech.edu The message with subject: [ActiveDir] Message Not Delivered and