I found kind of a nasty bug in ADFIND, please download the new version if
you use adfind for your query needs. If you don't, why don't you use it?
Seriously. I am curious, email me directly. I have been working on that tool
for years to make it one of the most powerful command line query tools
It may have changed in the last year, since I no longer do
Unity support, but Cisco Unity required you to create a "UnityInstall" account
and use that (with specific permissions of course) to install Unity and any
updates. There is also a UnityAdmin account and there are two Unity Exchange
Crap sorry I didn't change the subject on this previously.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 3:30 AM
To:
I was kinda wondering :-)
You just want to get me using command line... I know
joe wrote:
Crap sorry I didn't change the subject on this previously.
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiseguard is a cost-efective solution and integrates directly with AD.
Regards,
Rodrigo.
On 1/28/06, Rimmerman, Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
~~
This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information
of the Cooper Cameron Corporation
We both know that's poor, but possibly necessary. I see creating a new account and granting the permissions *specifically* required as normal business. Having to install under the 500 Administrator account is not what I call *normal* by any stretch. Regardless if it's Microsoft or somebody else
I think the part that I don't get is what your exact idea of SSO is, Russ. I mean, Active Directory is a great central authentication platform. It has other components that can be useful such as AzMan, ADAM, and WS*. But it wouldn't be much of a deal to cause your applications to use Active
Russ:
We pursuing a "reduced" sign on
environment as opposed to a single sign on. Fortunately we've been able to
leverage AD as our "authoritative source" for IDs and passwords but due to the
plethora of heterogeneous applications, not all of them can leverage AD as the
authentication and
Thanks, I'll look at NMAP.
One of the issues is that we still have a good amount (~1000) of Windows 95 in use. So the don't show up on alot of tools (OLDCMP, ADUC, etc.) We only have 2 DHCP servers so I know that if they get a lease I can count them which is what I'm concerned about right now. I
