If I understand correctly, replmon shows connection object info that
was retrieved from the dc itself. dssite.msc shows the connection
object info from the dc the snap-in is focused on.
please correct me if i've misunderstood
M@
On 7/19/06, Noah Eiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi –
I a
Title: root admin account able to be locked out?
Jorge (and joe),
Thanks for your reply on this issue!
Mike Thommes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:43
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.o
> Will the application run off of an ADAM
instance instead of a full blown forest?
That was going through my mind as well - why would the
vendor want to use a NOS AD for his application? Again, there must be some
reason for this.
joe makes great points rgd. the support issues of an
appl
you might want to describe to us what your actual goal is
for creating a non-fully trusted domain in your AD forst. Maybe you can
reach a similar goal by using the fairly powerful capabilities in AD to delegate
administration of objects within a domain. You can also use these features to
hi
Hi Steve
Binary version is 5.2.3790.1830 (srv03_sp1_rtm.050324-1447)
Clearing the cache does not fix the issue.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Linehan
Sent: 22 Jul 2006 0:56
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; Activ
:)
The main thing I don't like is AD Integrated. There is
something fundamentally wrong with having your directory replication completely
dependent on the name resolution system that is completely dependent on the
directory replication system that is completely dependent on the name re
"- stop using mirrors damnit) ."[1]
can you please explain that? What's wrong with mirrors?
[1] joe, speaking particularly in the context of Exchange
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/th
Hi Joe,
I installed NetMon on that workstation and it seems that nothing gets out on
the wire with the failure case. And quite normal LDAP searches in the success
case.
I also did a little more testing and found out that the user doesn't need to be
a domain admin for the script lines to work.
Mirrors don't scale.
Microsoft's deployment doc mostly just talks about using mirrors (small nod
to RAID 10/0+1) so everyone thinks that they should build their Corporate
DCs on mirrors, usually 3 - OS, Logs, and DIT. Very few people if anyone
would build a corporate Exchange Server on mirrors...
My trusted directory resource,
I don’t remember if this came up on a previous post…
but don’t recall seeing the topic. As things become more and more
integrated w/ some form of ldap authentication against a common directory, the
necessity for managing outside vendors, contractors, etc
Any
poor implementation is going to hurt you but I would argue that you are
better off with a poor BIND/QIP DNS implementation than a poor Windows DNS
implementation just because of the whole dependency loop thing.
If you
can adequately state your needs to a UNIX DNS group they can usual
Windows or 3rd party firewall related??
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
t Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sakari Kouti
> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 11:39 AM
> To: ActiveDir@
Federation is the way of the future in these scenarios. I'm spending about
50% of my time at work these days helping to build out our federation
infrastructure and imagine that we'll be using it extensively. We are
already doing some type of federation thing with over 30 vendor-hosted apps
in
Nope. Not ICF or any other firewall on on these Virtual PC machines.
Yours, Sakari
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: 22. heinäkuuta 2006 21:02
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RootDSE requires admin priv
no debate from me. I was just asking. Thank you for the lesson.
- Original Message -
From: "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Raid 1 tangent -- Vendor Domain
Mirrors don't scale.
Microsoft's deployment doc mostly just talk
joe,
you must type really, really fast
- Original Message -
From: "Albert Duro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Raid 1 tangent -- Vendor Domain
no debate from me. I was just asking. Thank you for the lesson.
That's a command line guy for you...
:o)
The thing is that I type in a very odd way two, my whole right hand just one
or two fingers from my left hand. People tend to get a bit confused when
they see me type.
joe
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.h
17 matches
Mail list logo