Title: Slightly OT - DNS Problems:
Hey All,
I am required to set up a trust with an acquisitions domain. Ports 53, 88 and 389 (TCP & UDP) are open on the firewall theirs and ours - Both Ways verified.
I have bought in a Forward Lookup Zone of their DNS - Secondary Zone, have
And of course, the problem with the a=x
conundrum, is the next to the last operation where you divide both sides by ‘a-x”.
You can’t do that when a=x because you are dividing by zero – a mathematical
no-no - you get infinity.
Steve Comeau
IT Manager
Rutgers Athletics
83 Rockefe
They like it because it shows that division by zero can bite you without
being obvious.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 4:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: wiki
Not at all - I did not include any multiplication signs between the
brackets - you've introduced them :/.
Read what I wrote at face value and you'll see it's quite valid (altho it
breaks various maths rules!)
neil
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PR
Title: FW: Script to move user account and computer accounts
Hi all
I was wondering if there is a script I can use that will move users accounts and computer accounts from one child domain to another child domain (Windows 2000). I don’t even know where to look for this, so if someone can p
Title: FW: Script to move user account and computer accounts
Admod from joeware.net can do the cross domain moves…
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Group, Russ
Sent: Monday, Octobe
Title: Certificate Authority unable to publish certs in AD
Hi guys
For some weird reason im getting the below errors on the certificate authority. CA is a one level issuing enterprise Ca, running on win2003 Enterprise Edition, with autoenrollment enable for a few usernames. GPO has been ena
Title: FW: Script to move user account and computer accounts
Look at ADMOD or ADMT for xdom
move.
If you actually want to copy a user, look
at ADMT. Note. ADMT won't perform a copy, when operating
intra-forest, by default. But you can configure it to do so
IIRC.
Other options are to c
DMZ? To begin with, why would you want to setup a trust and leave the firewalls in palce with so few ports? What is then the point of the trust? Even if you got the trust working like that (there are more ports - I think Jorge has a blog on this) you would not be able to access anything so it doe
LOL. It's in the rest room I'm told...
--Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Milburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange 2007 Schema
For the BrettSh T-Shirt, my vote is for the line to be split
BrettSh T-
Shirt
Hello all, I had to do dump in AD all users whose password never expires. I used the saved queries with this custom ldap query : useraccountcontrol=66048 which corresponds to NORMAL_ACCOUNT & DONT_EXPIRE_PASSWORD properties flag. BUT i found that this search was not complete, because some us
to search for accounts that HAVE
the option "DONT_EXPIRE_PASSWORD" enabled
ADFIND
-bit -default -f "(&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(userAccountControl:AND:=65536))"
and to use it with a saved query
use as the LDAP filter:
(&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(userAccountC
Perform an AND query.
In ADFIND, this looks like
this:
adfind -default -bit -f
"&(objectCategory=person)(userAccountControl:AND:=65536)" cn
If you want to use ADUC, or something
else, you'll need to use this:
(&(objectCategory=person)(useraccountcontrol:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=65536
It looks like TechED 2007 New Orleans has been cancelled and will be in another
location next year.
Has anyone stateside heard where it is going to be as of yet?
Quote:
Microsoft cancels 3 New Orleans meetings, cites lack of flights
Lack of airline flights in and out of New Orleans prompted M
Hi all,
I'm consulting on a divestiture, and naturally the companies want their respective AD forests to have the minimum amount of contact necessary to migrate the security principals in the divestiture from company A to company B. I wanted to sanity check with this brain trust that we can do a
I checked with some folks internally, and they confirmed that yes, this is
unfortunately true.
There are numerous discussions going on, and the recommendation is that you
should watch http://microsoft.com/teched over the next week or two for updates
and information.
Brian Puhl
Microsoft IT
--
I don't think I see what you really want to accomplish? Why, if you're going to firewall the networks off anyway, do you need to migrate vs. Microsoft shuffle (create new on target, delete legacy) ? Are other resources coming with that rely on these? Or are those being migrated as well? Is it just
Yes ! thanks, that works so well !! :o) But many questions i have.. What is the difference between the query "userAccountControl=65536" and "(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=65536)" ? Why couldn(t i find any results with my first query ? And how do you construct the ":1.2.840.11
Yes, there are several terabytes of server-related resources going with the divestiture and it would be an enormous job to rebuild all the access control from scratch. Sorry, I should have mentioned that.
On 10/9/06, Al Mulnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think I see what you really want to
Thanks Paul. That works great :) YannPaul Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Perform an AND query. In ADFIND, this looks like this: adfind -default -bit -f "&(objectCategory=person)(userAccountControl:AND:=65536)" cn If you want to use ADUC, or
something else, y
It is a shame. The city really needs the business. I've been back 3
times now since the storm and things have definitely gotten better,
but it still has a long way to go.
Most of the US has kind of forgotten about it by now, so I'm guessing
that many TechEd visitors would be shocked at how mess
>>userAccountControl=65536
check if all enabled options/bits (unique combination) represent a total of
65536
>>userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=65536
check if only the option/bit represented by 65536 is enabled
Met vriendelijke groeten / Kind regards,
Ing. Jorge de Almeida Pinto
Seni
So, if I understand correctly you want to migrate the users along with sid-history so that you can also take along a bunch of file servers with it's permissions that are already set for one of the domains in your forest A? When the divestiture occurs, you'll push the user information over.
"- Conf
No, actually, 1(-1+1)(-1+1) is the same as writing
1*(-1+1)*(-1+1).
You can not imply a + or - sign. Since there's not an explicit + or
- between the first 1 and opening paren., then you cannot assume one. You
can, however, imply a multiplication What you've written implies
multipli
We're going to run a test in the lab in the next few days, then a dry run with the real forest B and a dummy forest B shortly after that.
On 10/9/06, Al Mulnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, if I understand correctly you want to migrate the users along with sid-history so that you can also take al
I'd be interested to hear how it turns out.
On 10/9/06, Harvey Kamangwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're going to run a test in the lab in the next few days, then a dry run with the real forest B and a dummy forest B shortly after that.
On 10/9/06, Al Mulnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, i
Do not run a service by using a service account that belongs to a
different domain:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=925099
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will
hun
27 matches
Mail list logo
