Hi everyone,
I have a truly intriguing one for you.
We have recently begun to experience an inconsistent problem where
by interactive network logon onto a Windows 2000 or Windows 2003 server
may take upwards of 40 mins to complete. The authenticating domain
controller is on a gigabit link to the
I've had a similar problem. In
digging through the problem, I found some of the following, usually by
tracing through the eventlog on the respective machine.
Computer account had a problem in the
domain - just needed to be removed and put back in
GPO policy processing - changed respective
Security Guru question...
I read somewhere...don't know where,
that it is possible to grant a power-user or otherwise non-admin the ability
to access administrative shares such as admin$, c$,...etc. I
believe that this is possible as of Windows 2003 and possibly Windows 2000.
I'm in a situation
Potentially interesting oddity occurred
today...
Our primary and secondary Windows 2003
/ AD integrated DNS server services abended at almost the exact same time.
I have custom WMI monitoring set to auto-restart them, send email,
call the president, and of course...raise the national threat
Potentially interesting oddity occurred
today...
Our primary and secondary Windows 2003
/ AD integrated DNS server services abended at almost the exact same time
with the following error message in the eventlog:
Reporting queued error:
faulting application dns.exe, version 5.2.3790.0, faulting
Looking for some guidance / help...
Our Enterprise Systems Management Group is in the process or rolling out
Tivoli to all locations. It doesn't seem logical or best practice, to me,
to put such an application on a Windows 2003 DC. When testing TMF 4.1
components on a test Windows 2003 DC,
I completely agree. I just wanted to ensure that I wasn't amiss with
disagreeing with putting Tivoli Managed Node components on a W2k3 DC.
We're aiming for MOM and its corresponding integration. I've looked at the
AD Option provided by Tivoli and am not excited at all. I'm having to
write a
Quite Ingenious...
Eric Jones, Senior SE
Intel Server Group
(W) 336.424.3084
(M) 336.457.2591
www.vfc.com
clister
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All, we are in search of the elusive single sign-on...
We are designing/testing pieces of what may become a multi-platform
authentication strategy. We've begun with the authentication integration
with IBM's Websphere. While we've been successful in its integration
(having Websphere on a
Thanks all for the feedback.
We are a very centralized shop as well (and seem to be on a company buying
spree...). The Enterprise Security team really wants to make AD the
strategic direction for authentication strategy as well part of a staged
user provisioning and automation mechanism.
No, MIIS is not being used. I don't believe that the Security Group
reviewed the product. They are about to pilot/implement CA Enterprise
Admin. Like MIIS, it has hooks into some of the major LDAPs and is
supposed to be very scriptable. In fact, although they have an AD
integration piece,
Thanks for the quick response. That's the route that I wanted to take.
Happy to see a second on the opinion.
Thanks again...executing plan now.
Eric Jones, Senior SE
Intel Server Group
(W) 336.424.3084
(M) 336.457.2591
www.vfc.com
Link appears not to work [for me]. And
I haven't been able to find the updated doc on Microsoft's website. Can
anyone else get to this link.
(anxiously waiting...for almost a year
now...)
Eric Jones, Senior SE
Intel Server Group
(W) 336.424.3084
(M) 336.457.2591
www.vfc.com
David Adner
Thanks, but that's the one for Windows2000.
I just saw a post on Microsoft's AD newsgroup. Microsoft (Jason Robarts)
states that they are having a problem with the download site and are
working to fix it. Jason Robarts is the MSFT person that originally posted
the link on MSFT's AD related
Yeah!
Huston...we have documentation...
Eric Jones, Senior SE
Intel Server Group
(W) 336.424.3084
(M) 336.457.2591
www.vfc.com
Eric Fleischman
The problem may not necessarily be configuration related. Are there any
startup scripts? More specifically, are there any settings that
require/force the respective machines to connect to any specific network
hosts. I'm wondering if the problem may relate to the inconsistently
consistent
Hello All,
I'm revising our global site design, to further reduce DCs and get more
efficient use of bandwidth. I'm finding that we have a number of physical
sites that do not necessarily have enough users to constitute a DC and who
also have high-speed connections to multiple other locations
Perfect! That is exactly what I needed to confirm.
I truly appreciate the help.
Eric Jones, Senior SE
Intel Server Group
(W) 336.424.3084
(M) 336.457.2591
www.vfc.com
|-+--
| | Roger Seielstad|
| |
Using WMI to write scripts to monitor
servers, specifically event logs works extremely well. I did just
that with WMI at our company. I went as far as to script out the
permanent monitoring of processes, processor, memory, disk, various eventlog
combinations, and various filesystem details. Your
Hello everyone, I'm looking for some peer feedback on part of a migration
plan.
We are currently an NT4 environment. We've decided to go with W2k3 AD
for our migration. We're doing a parallel migration into a W2k3 Native
functional level forest. This was specifically to give us easier
Maximum pagefile size is not 4GB. The limit for a manually configured
pagefile is 4GB. When set to System Managed, the page file(s) will be
whatever the server needs. You 'must' use the setting of system managed
to accommodate servers with more that this amount of memory. Otherwise the
Here ya' go. You will probably enjoy managing with Tivoli's current
products. I'm monitoring our entire W2k3/AD lab environment with Tivoli.
I think they've gotten it right this time (with customization).
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/Portals/TivoliTME10MailingList
Eric
Tivoli today is not nearly as horrible on the Windows Server Platform as it
may have been before. Reference the following article...starting at about
paragraph 7:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=6502661
IBM's IBM Tivoli Monitoring products are nearly
23 matches
Mail list logo