Title: RE: Site Link Bridging
The primary reason I have
disabled site link bridging in the past has been to prevent domain controllers
in spokes with replicating with other dc's in spoke sites that are in another
hub site when they should only be replicating with DC's in the hub sites and
The Exchange 5.5 directory
should be listening on another port since it is running on a DC that is already
listening on 389 for AD LDAP operations.
If possible it would probably be a lot
safer and easier to build a new Exchange 2003 server and just migrate to the new
machine...if possi
I have used it between a Windows 2000 Forest and a Windows 2003 Forest to Sync
the GAL between the two.
The only odd requirement I recall was that the req's said it had to run on a
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition server and I ended up installing on a
Windows 2003 Ent Edition member serv
Title: [ActiveDir] 2003 DFS/open files
The client will continue to
have the file open but depends on what action they take next...if they close the
file..nothing.
If they save the file, the last write is
going to win and possibly replace the changes that were made on the file saved
prev
I'm currently running the
DFS-R component of R2 between several branch offices and my central data center
and everything is working well.
The only thing I wish MS had released with
Windows 2003 R2 was an updated management pack for MOM 2005 to monitor the new
DFS-R services.
Other th
Title: [ActiveDir] external trust between NT4 domain and windows 2003 fails
Are any of these
domain controllers on VMWARE?
Ion
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Fri 3/3/2006 11:20
AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir]
external trust bet
I believe this issue really
depended on the permissions on the mailbox and the synchronization of the
security attributes. I can't recall but I believe it did behave a bit different
in Exchange 2000.
I use NOMAS.exe to fix
and sync the permissions when I enable/disable accounts. All m
the other post from Joe which mentions coming up with
your own benchmarks. That takes a lot of the ambiguity out of the
equation.
Be sure to put plenty of memory in the new machines.
;)
On 2/1/06, Ion Gott
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe the number of
GC's
Title: Putting a DC on VMware
ExactlyI totally
agree!
Ion V.
Gott
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of joeSent: Tue 1/31/2006 10:09 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Putting a DC on
VMware
Great, two competing KB articles:
http://support.microso
I believe the number of GC's
would really still be dependent on your site topology, number of objects
published to the GC, number of child domains in the forest etc.. and
location of Exchange servers in relation to users. Also if clients are using
applications that are directly dependent on
Title: Putting a DC on VMware
Definitely good points on
some of the key items to take into account when it comes to the virtualization
of anything.
In regards to Microsoft stance on support
of DC's on virtualization platforms, this changed a few months ago and it is
actually now supporte
11 matches
Mail list logo
