RE: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT

2006-05-17 Thread Stuart Kwan
Oh ye of little faith.* _ * My personal views and not those of my employer, of course. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:55 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or

RE: [ActiveDir] Aelita's ER Disk may render AD not supported

2003-06-17 Thread Stuart Kwan
and making modifications? If the operation is not on par with the illustrations I listed, what exactly goes wrong when using them. Todd Myrick -Original Message- From: Stuart Kwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:21 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Aelita's ER Disk may render AD not supported

2003-06-16 Thread Stuart Kwan
Title: Aelita's ER Disk may render AD not supported Please note that KB article Q296257 was updated on Friday 06/13. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;296257 Cheers, Stuart [This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.]

RE: [ActiveDir] AD synchronization

2003-03-31 Thread Stuart Kwan
Title: Message David - yes, your conclusion two messages down is correct. Cheers, - Stuart [This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.] -Original Message-From: Sullivan, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:02

RE: [ActiveDir] Availability of AD/AM

2003-02-05 Thread Stuart Kwan
We're planning a public beta of ADAM before the end of the first quarter of this year. I'll post to this list when the package gets posted to http://www.microsoft.com/ad. We're planning to RTM ADAM 30-90 days after the RTM of Windows Server 2003. Cheers, Stuart [This posting is

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Lab

2003-01-07 Thread Stuart Kwan
Indexes are defined in the schema, and the schema is the same throughout the forest. As far as I know, there are no additional indexes on GCs. Little known fact: Active Directory knows to short circuit certain operations that require a GC if it knows it is in a single domain environment. For

RE: [ActiveDir] Hardening Active Directory

2002-12-31 Thread Stuart Kwan
A good general guide for securing Active Directory can be found at: http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/directory/AD/AD_SecurityPt1.asp Cheers, Stuart P.S. I think everyone should read that paper, by the way. [This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties,

RE: [ActiveDir] Securing AD Best Practices Paper

2002-12-19 Thread Stuart Kwan
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Securing AD Best Practices Paper Were still working on Part II. Look again at the end of January or so. - Stuart [This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: [ActiveDir] which W2K groups does the 5000 limit apply to?

2002-12-04 Thread Stuart Kwan
In Windows 2000, Microsoft recommends that you place no more than 5000 direct members in *any* kind of group in Active Directory (be it universal, global, local, security-enabled, or mail-enabled). This is a recommendation, not an enforced restriction, based on testing of Active Directory on what

RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2

2002-10-25 Thread Stuart Kwan
Does it use SID History for the migration? -Original Message- From: Sullivan, Kevin [mailto:KSullivan;aelita.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 6:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] ADMT v2 Aelita Domain Migration Wizard... (For one) -Original Message- From:

RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Operations Guide

2002-10-01 Thread Stuart Kwan
Hey Gil, who is Mike Barnard? -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:11 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Operations Guide I thought *everyone* knew about this... yet another case of a