[ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts

2006-08-25 Thread Wyatt, David
Title: Message Hello   Imagine the following scenario, you have an internal W2K3 forest and an external W2K3 forest on the DMZ.  Management wish to create one-way trust between the two forests so the DMZ forest trusts the internal forest for an application.   I have read that this is obviou

RE: [ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts

2006-08-25 Thread Guest, Mike
__ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wyatt, David Sent: 25 August 2006 11:10 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts   Hello   Imagine the following scenario, you have an

Re: [ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts

2006-08-25 Thread Al Mulnick
Where are you pulling the "not recommended" from?   The issues are not typically technical, but rather procedural once you get past the, "yes, but if it's a DMZ, should internal users have direct access?" questions. :)   One other thing to point out: the users will also have to have direct access

RE: [ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts

2006-08-29 Thread Wyatt, David
h would have specific rules for the services that are required. -David   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: 25 Aug 2006 18:01To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts Where are you pulling

Re: [ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts

2006-08-29 Thread Al Mulnick
gt;DMZ anyway.  There would be a set of rules for external--->DMZ and internal--->DMZ.  Each would have specific rules for the services that are required. -David   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: 25 Aug 2006 18:01To: Act

RE: [ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts

2006-08-29 Thread Wyatt, David
Title: Message Thanks for your comments.   -David   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: 29 Aug 2006 14:56To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] DMZ and Trusts Interesting.  I stick by the