[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Al Mulnick
*Sent:* Monday, January 08, 2007 7:53 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
Weird name but they get good press. I haven't tried them myself, but I've
heard of them.
Most of the others out there
: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
What a weird name - thanks for the link
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 7:33 PM
To
]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wells, James
Arthur
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 9:39 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
If there are enough deltas that aren’t being made by Dynamic DNS, then I would
…
--James
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 8:28 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
Integrated. They tell me they make a couple updates a day to the zone.
Thanks,
Brian
: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
Weird name but they get good press. I haven't tried them myself, but I've
heard of them.
Most of the others out there tend to want to take over the DNS vs. provide
tools. Personally, I'm a fan of setting it up well (design for success and
name – thanks for the link*
* *
*Thanks,*
*Brian Desmond*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* *
*c - 312.731.3132*
* *
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia
*Sent:* Monday, January 08, 2007 7:33 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
Comments
I like these guys: http://www.miceandmen.com/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 4:56 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
Well there hasn’t been some sort of ruling on
I like these guys: http://www.miceandmen.com/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 4:56 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
Well there hasn’t been some sort of ruling on
]
c - 312.731.3132
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 1:35 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments
Backup a second - how do you plan to manage the zones?
I ask because this might be
Backup a second - how do you plan to manage the zones?
I ask because this might be a good time to re-evaluate the metadata concept
of the zones.
In BIND you see that information because of the way you manage the zone. In
AD there is a different way to manage the zone information that doesn't
in
Has anyone on this DL have experience with this problem?
I am working on potentially migrating numerous UNIX BIND zones to AD
Integrated DNS. The BIND zones have various comments in them which go
with the record. I believe the dnsNode class in AD supports a notes
field or similar but the GUI do
11 matches
Mail list logo