Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-09 Thread Al Mulnick
[mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Al Mulnick *Sent:* Monday, January 08, 2007 7:53 PM *To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org *Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments Weird name but they get good press. I haven't tried them myself, but I've heard of them. Most of the others out there

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-09 Thread neil.ruston
: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments What a weird name - thanks for the link Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 7:33 PM To

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-09 Thread Brian Desmond
] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wells, James Arthur Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 9:39 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments If there are enough deltas that aren’t being made by Dynamic DNS, then I would

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-08 Thread Wells, James Arthur
… --James From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 8:28 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments Integrated. They tell me they make a couple updates a day to the zone. Thanks, Brian

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-08 Thread Brian Desmond
: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments Weird name but they get good press. I haven't tried them myself, but I've heard of them. Most of the others out there tend to want to take over the DNS vs. provide tools. Personally, I'm a fan of setting it up well (design for success and

Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-08 Thread Al Mulnick
name – thanks for the link* * * *Thanks,* *Brian Desmond* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *c - 312.731.3132* * * *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia *Sent:* Monday, January 08, 2007 7:33 PM *To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-08 Thread Brian Desmond
Comments I like these guys: http://www.miceandmen.com/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 4:56 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments Well there hasn’t been some sort of ruling on

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-08 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
I like these guys: http://www.miceandmen.com/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 4:56 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments Well there hasn’t been some sort of ruling on

RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-08 Thread Brian Desmond
] c - 312.731.3132 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 1:35 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments Backup a second - how do you plan to manage the zones? I ask because this might be

Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-07 Thread Al Mulnick
Backup a second - how do you plan to manage the zones? I ask because this might be a good time to re-evaluate the metadata concept of the zones. In BIND you see that information because of the way you manage the zone. In AD there is a different way to manage the zone information that doesn't in

[ActiveDir] DNS Comments

2007-01-05 Thread Brian Desmond
Has anyone on this DL have experience with this problem? I am working on potentially migrating numerous UNIX BIND zones to AD Integrated DNS. The BIND zones have various comments in them which go with the record. I believe the dnsNode class in AD supports a notes field or similar but the GUI do