[ActiveDir] DSACLS - is this normal ?

Sorry if this is a dup - didn't see it after several hours.. I posted on this topic before but I think I can explain the issue more clearly now... If I use the /S switch of DSACLS to restore the ACLS of an object back to the default as defined in the schema, the object no longer inherits auditing

[ActiveDir] DSACLS - Is this normal ?

I posted on this topic before but I think I can explain the issue more clearly now... If I use the /S switch of DSACLS to restore the ACLS of an object back to the default as defined in the schema, the object no longer inherits auditing entries. The simplest test to observe this is: 1. create a