Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...)

2006-01-13 Thread Brett Shirley
Al, I always wished that Microsoft would support multiple file versions like VMS did. I'm just curious, if you have the time, for my own edification, what was this VMS file system feature? Could you elaborate how it worked? Cheers, BrettSh [msft] SDE - ESE On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Al

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...)

2006-01-13 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
, 2006 10:46 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...) Al, I always wished that Microsoft would support multiple file versions like VMS did. I'm just curious, if you have the time, for my own edification, what was this VMS file system feature? Could

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...)

2006-01-13 Thread Brett Shirley
? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brett Shirley Sent: Fri 1/13/2006 12:46 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...) Al, I always wished that Microsoft would support multiple file versions like VMS did. I'm

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...)

2006-01-13 Thread deji
worried about Yesterday? -anon From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Robert Bobel Sent: Fri 1/13/2006 1:23 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...) Doesn't shadow copy essentially give you

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...)

2006-01-13 Thread joe
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Lilianstrom Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 3:55 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: DEC 2006 (way OT ...) Brett Shirley wrote: Al, I always wished that Microsoft would support multiple