RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-09 Thread Kim Kruse Hansen
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load A simple solution to this problem is to install to \windows and then create a junction point from \winnt to \windows for the legacy apps. Kim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-07 Thread Marcus.Oh
: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:31 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load I would ask them why they need this. It may make things easier for them now but at what point do you adopt the standard structure from MS? You could possibly run

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-07 Thread Bahta Nathaniel V Contr NASIC/SCNA
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:32 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load When have you found it not to resolve. This env var is pretty important

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-07 Thread Rick Kingslan
: RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load I have come to find that our Engineers are actually the ones pushing for the WINNT directory so the legacy apps will continue to function, at least the ones that don't call a variable. The SMS/Tivoli folks are intersted in moving forward

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-06 Thread Peter Johnson
I believe you can do this using an answer /transform file for the unattended install process. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bahta Nathaniel V Contr NASIC/SCNA Sent: 06 June 2005 12:06 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject:

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-06 Thread Bahta Nathaniel V Contr NASIC/SCNA
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Johnson Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:45 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load I believe you can do this using an answer /transform file for the unattended install

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-06 Thread Rick Kingslan
: Monday, June 06, 2005 7:37 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load Ok, but I am trying to do it from an install that I am doing interactively. Isnt there some kind of command line switch or something like that for WINNT.EXE? I looked

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-06 Thread Dan Holme
Contr NASIC/SCNA Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 7:37 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load Ok, but I am trying to do it from an install that I am doing interactively. Isnt there some kind of command line switch or something like

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-06 Thread joe
I would ask them why they need this. It may make things easier for them now but at what point do you adopt the standard structure from MS? You could possibly run into other apps that have issues with this. I can't think of any valid reaons for doing this other than it is work for someone who

RE: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load

2005-06-06 Thread joe
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Alternate install Directory for W2K3 load All, Has anyone experienced any issues by installing W2Kx into an alternative location? In this scenario if the other teams are using applications that utilise WINNT, are they potentially out of date