e :)
neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent: 14 December 2005 09:12
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross forest trust and DNS
Thanks Jorge
I was aware of these. The provide good detail, but bo
e :)
neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent: 14 December 2005 09:12
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross forest trust and DNS
Thanks Jorge
I was aware of these. The provide good detail, but both of them a
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005 8:25 p.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross forest trust and DNS
Tony,
Found the following documents. I think this is what you were looking for
Planning and Implementing Federated Forests
Sent: Wed 12/14/2005 3:46 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross forest trust and DNS
Agreed, although it's nice to have a documented model to hand alongside the
testing, as there are sometimes environmental variables that could sk
p.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross forest trust and DNS
A
network monitor and a test environment is often better than any other source. J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 5
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005
1:59 p.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross
forest trust and DNS
More information…
The DNS interactions work as follows (note
that I have excluded most other
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005 1:59 p.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross forest trust and DNS
More
information…
The
DNS interactions work as follows (note that I have excluded most other
, December 13, 2005
2:00 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross
forest trust and DNS
Thanks Jorge and Deji for
your responses.
It sounds like
we’re all pretty much of the same opinion, i.e. that there will be a
sequence of attempts against a list of DCs in Forest B
configuring NOT to register domain wide DC locator records might work also.
jorge
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tony Murray
Sent: Tue 12/13/2005 11:00 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross forest trust and DNS
Thanks Jorge
doesn’t impact anything else.
Tony
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Almeida Pinto,
Jorge de
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005 9:39 a.m.
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Cross forest trust and DNS
I would think the client
I would think the client
receives a list of referrals and use the DC on top of the list and goes
down the list until it finds a DC that responds. A client simply does not know
why a certain DC does not respond. It can be anything... firewall, network, DC
down or whatever.
As there is no site
If the DC is unreacheable, the client places it in a (temporary?) blacklist
and doesn't try it again for a set period of time.
Now, what follows next is an informed guess (OK, maybe just a guess). the
client will receive multiple DCs in the referral and will then move onto the
next DC on that
12 matches
Mail list logo
