Title: Message
Thanks
for your comments.
-David
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: 29 Aug 2006 14:56To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] DMZ and
Trusts
Interesting. I stick by the
gt;DMZ anyway. There would be a set of rules for external--->DMZ and internal--->DMZ. Each would have specific rules for the services that are required.
-David
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent:
25 Aug 2006 18:01To: Act
h would have specific rules for the services that
are required.
-David
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Al MulnickSent: 25 Aug 2006 18:01To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] DMZ and
Trusts
Where are you pulling
Where are you pulling the "not recommended" from?
The issues are not typically technical, but rather procedural once you get past the, "yes, but if it's a DMZ, should internal users have direct access?" questions. :)
One other thing to point out: the users will also have to have direct access
Title: Message
David,
The solution you require is documented by
Microsoft as the “perimeter network scenario” in the following
Microsoft document
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/technologies/directory/activedirectory/fedffin2.mspx
One gotcha is t
