RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-09 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 1/7/2006 3:56 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Hi Steve, Just noted your comment on trying to interpret the Userenv Log. I always

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-07 Thread Steve Rochford
: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Okey dokey. I figured this out after a bit of repro in my lab. Its kinda interesting. So, basically the duplicate GPO processing is a function of using Loopback policy in merge mode only (replace mode doesn't cause this). And, when I looked

Re: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-07 Thread support
Sent: 04 January 2006 18:14 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy John- I don't doubt this is the behavior you're seeing, but loopback *should* not cause this. At least not given the way its *supposed* to work. So, that is why a userenv log

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-06 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Rochford Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:55 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy I'm glad that you say loopback shouldn't cause this - I was sure I'd used something

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-05 Thread Steve Rochford
18:14 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy John- I don't doubt this is the behavior you're seeing, but loopback *should* not cause this. At least not given the way its *supposed* to work. So, that is why a userenv log would be very

Re: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
Hi Steve,... Looks like you have a loopback policy. That would be under computer configuration/administrative templates/system/Group Policy/User Group Policy loopback processing mode Hope this helps, John

Re: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread Al Mulnick
Steve, it looks like, from that list that you're not applying all GPO's twice. Some are and some aren't. That seems to me like it would be a configuration issue. allpcs Proxy_ISA -applied once Default Domain Policy - applied twiceLogonLogoffScripts Local Group Policy Default

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread Steve Rochford
Enabled From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Al Mulnick Sent: Wed 04/01/2006 14:16 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Steve, it looks like, from that list that you're not applying all GPO's

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Steve, it looks like, from that list that you're not applying all GPO's twice. Some are and some aren't. That seems to me like it would be a configuration issue. allpcs Proxy_ISA -applied once

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread Steve Rochford
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 04/01/2006 15:50 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Hi Steve... That's about the only way to apply user settings to computers, using the loopback. Not sure of your

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Steve, it looks like, from that list that you're not applying all GPO's twice. Some are and some aren't. That seems to me like it would be a configuration issue. allpcs Proxy_ISA

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
, January 04, 2006 7:50 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Hi Steve... That's about the only way to apply user settings to computers, using the loopback. Not sure of your OU structure, if you had your users seperated, you could apply

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread Darren Mar-Elia
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Not to doubt your expertise Darren, but we use a worksation loopback here for the screen saver. Not my idea, but in our situation, it is easier to figure out machines that need to be exempt, rather than users. They could run a certain

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
what's up. Darren -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:57 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Not to doubt your expertise Darren

RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy

2006-01-04 Thread jpsalemi
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:57 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Duplicate application of group policy Not to doubt your expertise Darren, but we use a worksation loopback here for the screen saver. Not my idea, but in our situation, it is easier