Only sort of wrong, there's a particular interface (NSPI/Named Service
Provider Interface) exposed by GCs that is used by Exchange. This interface
wasn't exposed on new GCs until they had been rebooted (that has been
addressed for 2K3), the other aspects of the GC take effect according to
somethin
11:37 AM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
Only sort of wrong, there's a particular interface (NSPI/Named Service
Provider Interface) exposed by GCs that is used by Exchange. This
interface wasn't exposed on new GCs until they had been rebooted (that
has bee
Actually, I did want to know the other stuff as wel :) Also, what exactly is
"occupancy level".
I had some EA's that saw a issue in AD where there were objects that were
deleted in AD but were still present in the GC(for months).
They called MS and MS told them this will snowball into a serious
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:47 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
NSPI startup/shutdown without a reboot was addressed in w2k3? Can you point
me toward any additional information? I ha
chnology
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
Actually, I did want to know
ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:26 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
"Occupancy level" is an integer (controlled via the DC's registry) that
represents how much of the total-partial foreign domain content a newly
designated GC must have sour
Eric,Joe,Al,Carlos,Guido Question for you guys and the wider audience.
What happens EXACTLY in Win2k on a DC(s) when the native mode switch is
pushed, and what are the ramifications of changing the attribute back to
reflect mixed mode one this has happened?
I have a customer with a nervous disposi
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:11 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
It is indeed dynamically enabled though I've not put that to the test.
I believe it was first fixed in Windows 2000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 4/20/2005 5:48 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
Actually, I did want to know the other stuff as wel :) Also, what
exactly is "occupancy level".
I had some EA's that saw a issue in AD where there
ent.
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
Actual
veDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
By golly you're right! (As expected.) Thanks.
A member of the Exchange team referred me to this KB
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=324941
I've also asked for KB 304403 to be corrected.
Thanks again,
M
//me runs off to change t
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
it will fail unless the other steps were taken to contrive how the GCs
re-sourced their content.-
what other steps?
repadmin/repmon?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Dean Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:26
Poltergeists.
Regards,
Aric Bernard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:53 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's
I never talked to the guy from MS, so I don't kn
13 matches
Mail list logo