RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

Only sort of wrong, there's a particular interface (NSPI/Named Service Provider Interface) exposed by GCs that is used by Exchange. This interface wasn't exposed on new GCs until they had been rebooted (that has been addressed for 2K3), the other aspects of the GC take effect according to somethin

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

11:37 AM To: Send - AD mailing list Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's Only sort of wrong, there's a particular interface (NSPI/Named Service Provider Interface) exposed by GCs that is used by Exchange. This interface wasn't exposed on new GCs until they had been rebooted (that has bee

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

Actually, I did want to know the other stuff as wel :) Also, what exactly is "occupancy level". I had some EA's that saw a issue in AD where there were objects that were deleted in AD but were still present in the GC(for months). They called MS and MS told them this will snowball into a serious

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:47 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's NSPI startup/shutdown without a reboot was addressed in w2k3? Can you point me toward any additional information? I ha

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

chnology * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msetechnology.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:49 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's Actually, I did want to know

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

ECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:26 PM To: Send - AD mailing list Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's "Occupancy level" is an integer (controlled via the DC's registry) that represents how much of the total-partial foreign domain content a newly designated GC must have sour

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

Eric,Joe,Al,Carlos,Guido Question for you guys and the wider audience. What happens EXACTLY in Win2k on a DC(s) when the native mode switch is pushed, and what are the ramifications of changing the attribute back to reflect mixed mode one this has happened? I have a customer with a nervous disposi

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:11 PM To: Send - AD mailing list Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's It is indeed dynamically enabled though I've not put that to the test. I believe it was first fixed in Windows 2000

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Sent: 4/20/2005 5:48 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's Actually, I did want to know the other stuff as wel :) Also, what exactly is "occupancy level". I had some EA's that saw a issue in AD where there

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

ent. -- Dean Wells MSEtechnology * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msetechnology.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:49 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's Actual

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

veDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's By golly you're right! (As expected.) Thanks. A member of the Exchange team referred me to this KB http://support.microsoft.com/?id=324941 I've also asked for KB 304403 to be corrected. Thanks again, M //me runs off to change t

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's it will fail unless the other steps were taken to contrive how the GCs re-sourced their content.- what other steps? repadmin/repmon? thanks -Original Message- From: Dean Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:26

RE: [ActiveDir] GC's

Poltergeists. Regards, Aric Bernard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:53 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GC's I never talked to the guy from MS, so I don't kn