PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO
applying.
Actually security is one
of those areas that stays around even after the policy is removed. There are
obvious advantages to that, and of course some disadvantages. But you're right,
the best approach if you want to remove a previous security policy
secedit /refreshpolicy machine_policy /enforce
From: Cothern Jeff D. Team EITCSent: Thu 07/10/2004 5:33 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] GPO applying.
A server we were working on was inadvertently moved into an OU that had a policy applied to it. That GPO had some settings that
, 2004
9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO
applying.
secedit /refreshpolicy machine_policy
/enforce
From: Cothern
Jeff D. Team EITC
Sent: Thu 07/10/2004 5:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] GPO applying.
A server we were working
What kind of policy was it Jeff? Admin Templates?
Other?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cothern Jeff D.
Team EITCSent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 2:33 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] GPO
applying.
A server
we were working on was
).
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cothern Jeff D. Team EITC
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004
4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO
applying.
Mixture. There were security options
etc set.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL
, October 07, 2004 5:33
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
GPO applying.
Mixture. There
were security options etc set.
-Original
Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Darren
Mar-EliaSent: Thursday,
October 07, 2004 6:11 PMTo:
[EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tyson
LeslieSent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 5:21 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] GPO
applying.
Have you tried re-applying the default security
template? (using Secedit, or the Security Config Analysis MMC
snapin...)
What functionality appears to be broken? (M
