RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions?

2003-09-05 Thread Robbie Allen
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Merry, Joel (US - Philadelphia) Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions? Even with the updated KCC algorithm, I'm still a fan of manual replication links. Even relying upon auto

RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions?

2003-09-05 Thread Jef Kazimer
.level3.net ([67.72.217.187] helo=mainpro) by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19v357-0001zi-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 04 Sep 2003 16:00:02 -0700 From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any

RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions?

2003-09-05 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Merry, Joel (US - Philadelphia) Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions? Even with the updated KCC algorithm, I'm still a fan of manual replication links. Even

RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions?

2003-09-04 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
I have some vicarious experience (I didn't have to implement the topology, but I helped the guys who did). 0) Don't do the replication topology manually if you can help it. But if you have no choice: 1) Keep the topology as simple as possible. 2) Verify transitive closure. 3) Lock down the

RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions?

2003-09-04 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
What about upgrading your servers to Windows Server 2003, the ISTG in W2K3 can handle up to 3,000 sites tested, 5,000 in theory. -Original Message- From: Jef Kazimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions?

2003-09-04 Thread Dean Wells
] Manual Replication - Any suggestions? What about upgrading your servers to Windows Server 2003, the ISTG in W2K3 can handle up to 3,000 sites tested, 5,000 in theory. -Original Message- From: Jef Kazimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:51 AM

RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions?

2003-09-04 Thread Joe
Hmm that seems kind of small to turn off the KCC. I wouldn't do it myself. In fact we have about 500 sites defined, 375 DC's spread across them, and nine domains. Most of the sites have a DC from one of the five main domains though. If you have a hub and spoke topology and the site links are

RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions?

2003-09-04 Thread Merry, Joel (US - Philadelphia)
-Original Message- From: Dean Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:56 PM To: AD mailing list (Send) Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Manual Replication - Any suggestions? That requires forest functional level 1 which would prevent the presence of any 2000 DCs in any domain