If there are files where you do not have read access (but do have
backup permissions) you will nead to use /B or /ZB to avoid access
denied problems.
Here we use robocopy as part of our backup solution. (We copy to disk
and to tape) and the following is an example
robocopy \\ficheros\shareroot$ m
-800-526-8273 x332
From: TIROA YANN
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005
3:00 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Robocopy command..
What about dfs ?
Yann
De :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
What about dfs ?
Yann
De :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
De la part de Frank AbagnaleEnvoyé : mardi 25 octobre
2005 12:05À : ActiveObjet : [ActiveDir] OT:
Robocopy command..
Hi.
I have used robocopy to copy an entire folder content from oldserver1
to newserver1.
I
I know it's not really what you've asked, but would VSS be a good option for you? It seems like a good alternative to what you're talking about, but would need a client on the desktops of people who you want to be able to recover items on their own.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/w
does /M help, it will behave like ntbackup with incremental backup type
i.e. if archive bit is set then only copy.
and as we know archive bit is set for new files and changed files.
On 10/25/05, Frank Abagnale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
I have used robocopy to copy an entire folder content
Hi Alain,
I have thought about this, but the supervisor of this dept does not want the files removed in the target directory if they are deleted in the source, he kind of wants this as an archived/backed up copy.Alain Lissoir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you looked at /MIR? (Mirror)
It adds
Have you looked at /MIR? (Mirror)
It adds files in the target folder added in the source
folder.
It updates files in the
target folder updated in the source folder.
It removes files in the
target folder removed in the source
folder.
Untouched files just
stay as they are and they are not cop
