RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000

2003-01-23 Thread Roger Seielstad
-Original Message- From: Brad Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000 Just to kinda qualify your answer, if you do a SQL cluster you must have AD deployed, but on a normal installation

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000

2003-01-23 Thread Andy David
Maybe he meant peanut clusters. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:41 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000 Oh really? Can you show me any documented proof of that? Its not listed in any

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000

2003-01-23 Thread stefano tufillaro
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 08:07:43 -0500 Maybe he meant peanut clusters. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 7:41 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000 Oh

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000

2003-01-22 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
1. No. 2. Not sure. 3. I believe that it publishes database location information. -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:50 PM To: ActiveDir (E-mail) Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000 Does SQL 2000 require the

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000

2003-01-22 Thread Roger Seielstad
No. No. Not much - just gives it a repository for user accounts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000

2003-01-22 Thread Brad Martin
: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000 No. No. Not much - just gives it a repository for user accounts. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger

RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000

2003-01-22 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
Ok thanks -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000 No. No. Not much - just gives it a repository for user accounts

Re: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL 2000

2003-01-22 Thread David Devlin
Justin, SQL 2000 does not require AD. I don't think SQL 2000 extends the schema (not positive), however you can use AD groups to manage users/access in SQL 2000 via AD authentication. David Devlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/22/03 03:49PM Does SQL 2000 require the presence of AD to be