Re: [ActiveDir] Question about dynamically binding aux classes

I will be out of the office on PTO starting Wednesday, July 12, 2006 and will return to the office on Monday, July 31, 2006. Please email your requests to the Help Desk email. If you cannot email, contact Selwyn (x129) or Oliver (x127) for any IT concerns. List info : http://www.activedir.org/

RE: [ActiveDir] Question about dynamically binding aux classes

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike BaudinoSent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 2:13 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Question about dynamically binding aux classes Joe,   Thank you for the detailed reply.  I now understand.     Thanks, Mike  On 7/11/06, joe &

Re: [ActiveDir] Question about dynamically binding aux classes

Joe,   Thank you for the detailed reply.  I now understand.     Thanks, Mike  On 7/11/06, joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Your problem is that your belief is incorrect[1]. :o)   First off, LDP and ADSIEDIT look at the world in different ways. LDP is LDAP based, ADSIEDIT is.. well ADSI based w

RE: [ActiveDir] Question about dynamically binding aux classes

Your problem is that your belief is incorrect[1]. :o)   First off, LDP and ADSIEDIT look at the world in different ways. LDP is LDAP based, ADSIEDIT is.. well ADSI based which then thunks down to LDAP eventually depending on the call and the provider being used. Things will be and are di