PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2003 04:04
Subject: [ActiveDir Digest]
-
From: Rogers, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:00:08 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
One question on
that. Dealing with the GC-Less sites.
I know that
Exchange2k relies heavily on GCs during their day to day processes.
Would perhaps E2k3 be more suited to this environment
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rogers, BrianSent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:00
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Good info
there...answered one of a number of questions I also had...although you did
add
No problem Deji. Glad I could be of service.
-Original Message-
From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I profusely apologize
Title: Message
I
always configure every DC as a DNS server. I consider that if a location
requires a DC, it also requires local DNS.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I
always configure every DC as a DNS server. I consider that if a location
requires a DC, it also requires local DNS.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems
]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Wow - really - - I
only hae one of my DCs as a DNS server - - all other DNS boxes are not DCs - -
too much going on
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 10:58 AM
.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:16
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Isnt the information
replicated anyway via AD? I guess if they were all
Title: Message
Thats really what I am talking
about - - same site too much chatter.
-Original Message-
From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:16
AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question
Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:16
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Isnt the information
replicated anyway via AD? I guess
MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Rogers, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:10
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I was looking more
along
Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: Rick Kingslan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:23
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
We backed up on the DNS issue. When first deployed,
it was DNS with DC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
We backed up on the DNS
issue. When first deployed, it was DNS with DC - always. We have
since done exhaustive studies that show that the traffic
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I
believe you are correct. Additionally, though, I don't think DNS replication traffic
is all that considerable. The worst data hog in DNS is the resolver cache,
which isn't replicated
Message-From: Roger
Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14,
2003 10:58
AMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I always
configure every DC as a DNS server. I consider that if a location requires a DC,
it also requires
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:11
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
That's really what I
am talking about - - same site too much chatter.
-Original
Message-From: Rogers,
Brian [mailto
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
This would be
correct. But, remember that in the replication strategy for Win2k - data
goes to every DC regardless if it's a DNS server or not - because once it's
DNS-integrated, it's now a part of the AD data
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
This
would be correct. But, remember that in the replication strategy for
Win2k - data goes to every DC regardless if it's a DNS server or not - because
once it's DNS-integrated, it's now a part of the AD data
Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Rogers, Brian
Sent: Mon 7/14/2003 11:53 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
WoahI musta missed that document. AD integrated DNS can now be separated from
, Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:26
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
So what is the impact
of placing DNS servers at each remote location? Significant? Or
minimal? (given connections are all greater
PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I'd
expect it to be minimal, although I don't have a lot of emperical data to
prove it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad
- MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems
ease times, scavenging periods and
such.
-gil
-Original Message-From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003
10:26 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I
believe you are correct. Additionally, thoug
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:19 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Yes, you did indeed miss
it. So, go find it. Yourself, this time with no help.
Hint:
Application partition is
the new partion in E2K3 which
-Original
Message-
From: deji Agba
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Yes,
you did indeed miss it. So, go find it. Yourself, this time with no help.
Hint
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 5:50 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I may have missed
something,but the snotty tone seems inappropriate...
In any case, to reduce
the apparent confusion:
GC-less sites have always
that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Mon 7/14/2003 2:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I may have missed something
u need to lay
off the coffee J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 7:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
I guess
it's my time to say Woah
Gil, my response was
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 7:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I guess it's my time to say Woah
Gil, my response was not in any way directed at you
e
same.
Sincerely,Dèjì Akómöláfé,
MCSE MCSA
MCP+Iwww.akomolafe.comwww.iyaburo.comDo you
now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday?
-anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of Gil KirkpatrickSent: Mon 7/14/2003 2:49 PMTo:
'[EMAIL P
: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:01
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Coffee? How did you know?
My reputation preceded me again :)
In any case, I went back and read my
original post. Flippant? maybe. Snotty, definitely not. As to Gil
Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
I guess it's my time
the data into the config or domain
partitions.
joe
-Original Message-
From: deji Agba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD integrated DNS question :)
Yes, you did
Title: Message
No sweatI apologize for my
comments as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
14, 2003 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
Coffee?
How did
www.iyaburo.com
Do you now realize that
Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on behalf of Rogers, Brian
Sent: Mon 7/14/2003 11:53 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Quick AD
integrated DNS question :)
WoahI
34 matches
Mail list logo
