RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread joe
You know I think the bad thing about this is simply that you are forcing the RUS to look at every single object again which is costly. During that time, it isn't, I believe, processing normal day to day stuff (i.e. changes). I could be wrong though. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread Michael B. Smith
I would be very interested to know what they perceive the adverse impact as being. While RUS can certainly be a PITA, and it's slow and expensive, I can't think of any reason why it must be avoided at all cost. There is (yet another) bug

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread Mulnick, Al
A no-no? Hmmm.. Depends on the environment and the circumstances and expected results. If it's not a good idea, somebody should mention that to Microsoft and have them update their procedures for troubleshooting to include a warning ;)

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread Mulnick, Al
that meet the criteria. Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check You know I think the bad thing about this is simply

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread deji
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mulnick, Al Sent: Tue 11/16/2004 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check It *should* process all changes when you rebuild vs. update. Rebuilding causes the RUS to process every account in AD as noted

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread joe
to hear that the RUS does #2. joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check It *should* process all changes when you

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread deji
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of joe Sent: Tue 11/16/2004 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check 1. Loop through all USN's from zero for all objects. I.E. the current USN is 23000, it asks for a query to return all objects

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread Mulnick, Al
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check I would agree, the issue I would see is that you are in the middle of a rebuild of 250k user objects. Say you are 150k into it, I would expect any changes in the first 150k

RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check

2004-11-16 Thread Mulnick, Al
the expecations of the customer. ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rebuilding RUS - sanity check Thanks, all. I got in touch with the source