Title: Message
|
That
is the only reason I have heard that may make it worth the extra $10 bucks a
year to register your name. Wouldn't this have also been the case if you
merged with a company with the same NetBIOS name in NT 4.0? What is the
probability of this happening?
If
you ever (never say never) merge with someone else and they have the same
forest name, you are hosified... We used root01.org and registered it. No ns
records for it anywhere. no conflicts..
I’m in the middle of having an
argument with the IT manager about the top-level domain name for our new
A.D. deployment. The manager wants to use a nonstandard name for the
domain (ie. Dc1.domain.gd) for the root domain. My position, which
I’ve read a number of places, is that we should use a standard, registered,
name for the root. The manager’s contention is that this domain will
never be live on the Net and so we can do whatever we want. As I said,
I’ve always read that you should use a registered name as your root, even if
you aren’t going to be live, but there are never reasons given why this is
good. What reasons should I go back to my manager
with?
Brad
Martin
|
