k the right
technology for your job.
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Kaplan
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:21 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Scaling up with AD or ADAM?
I personally don't have any experi
half Of Joe Kaplan
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:21 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Scaling up with AD or ADAM?
I personally don't have any experience with ADAM at "big" scale, but
I've
heard of some really large deployments. Eric might be able to sh
that might not be a huge
deal. I don't think ADFS uses that either. :)
Joe K.
- Original Message -
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Scaling up with AD or ADAM?
Thanks,
Thanks, Joe.
I'll look up Eric's blog for metrics and such ASAP. :-)
I was thinking ADAM was the likely choice - just wasn't sure how much
production experience folks had with it (it's still new-ish), or quite
how to size it.
Re federation - that looks like a subsequent phase, and ADFS definit
That's a classic scenario for ADAM. I wouldn't use AD for that as you just
need bind auth for users of a web app. AD actually gives you a ton of stuff
you don't need and some additional complexity. ADAM scales the same as AD,
so there is no advantage from a scale point of view to use AD.
I'
