From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrutherford@;dek.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: ActiveDir (E-mail); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Site and Site Link Question
>
>
> They will all cross replicate, i.e.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrutherford@;dek.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: ActiveDir (E-mail); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Site and Site Link Question
>
>
> They will all cross replicate, i.e.
et.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:29 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site and Site Link Question
>
>
> Roger, your ATM Cloud, do they all share one Site Link?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Seielstad [
Roger, your ATM Cloud, do they all share one Site Link?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:22 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site and Site Link Question
Ca
Can you? Yes.
Should you? It depends on how much excess WAN capacity you have. I'd tend to
make site links that mirror the WAN topology. The only downside is that in
your case, it would double the max latency for replication of changes.
In our environment, we have 3 major sites that are connected
: ActiveDir (E-mail); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [ActiveDir] Site and Site Link Question
They will all cross replicate, i.e. the spokes replicating from other
spokes.. dragging your lines down I learned from experience
Robert Rutherford
MIS Department - DEK
+44 (0)1305
They will all cross replicate, i.e. the spokes replicating from other
spokes.. dragging your lines down I learned from experience
Robert Rutherford
MIS Department - DEK
+44 (0)1305 208232
+44 (0)7970 122362
