RE: [ActiveDir] seeAlso

2006-09-15 Thread joe
I generally try to dissuade folks from pillaging the base schema attributes... While MSFT may not be using them now it doesn't mean that later they won't start and you could be stuck in a difficult position. Creating a new attribute is relatively painless if you follow the basic rules, get an OID

RE: [ActiveDir] seeAlso

2006-09-06 Thread Isenhour, Joseph
4:01 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] seeAlso I've not seen it used by any specific app. Bear in mind that it is: multivalued not indexed not a member of the partial attribute set (i.e. not replicated via GC) Tony PS. I've always wanted to extend the schema

Re: [ActiveDir] seeAlso

2006-09-05 Thread Tony Murray
I've not seen it used by any specific app. Bear in mind that it is: multivalued not indexed not a member of the partial attribute set (i.e. not replicated via GC) Tony PS. I've always wanted to extend the schema with a new attribute named tracesOfPeanuts, simply so I can see May Contain:

Re: [ActiveDir] seeAlso

2006-09-05 Thread Tomasz Onyszko
Tony Murray wrote: Tony PS. I've always wanted to extend the schema with a new attribute named tracesOfPeanuts, simply so I can see May Contain: tracesOfPeanuts. :-) ROTFL -- Tomasz Onyszko http://www.w2k.pl/ - (PL) http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/ - (EN) List info :

RE: [ActiveDir] seeAlso

2006-09-05 Thread Brian Desmond
@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] seeAlso I've not seen it used by any specific app. Bear in mind that it is: multivalued not indexed not a member of the partial attribute set (i.e. not replicated via GC) Tony PS. I've always wanted to extend the schema with a new attribute named