Funes
From: Ion GottSent: Wed 2/1/2006 11:28 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] x64 domain controller sizing?
This may be helpful to everyone as well:
Global Catalog Servers
Global catalog servers are required for logon because they
er global catalog server usage, a large Active Directory, or large distribution lists can necessitate more global catalog servers.
Ion V. Gott
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mauricio F. Funes
Sent: Wed 2/1/2006 10:25 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] x6
kSent: Wed 2/1/2006
10:06 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re:
[ActiveDir] x64 domain controller sizing?
Really? I didn't get that from the documentatioin the same you
mention. I always took it that you wanted to put it on the same network to
avoid network issues where possibl
: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] x64 domain controller sizing?
Really? I didn't get that from the documentatioin the same you mention. I always took it that you wanted to put it on the same network to avoid network issues where possible, related to WAN connectivity or la
Really? I didn't get that from the documentatioin the same you mention. I always took it that you wanted to put it on the same network to avoid network issues where possible, related to WAN connectivity or latency. Basically, Exchange is so dependent on a GC that you want to provide the best pos
I believe the number of GC's
would really still be dependent on your site topology, number of objects
published to the GC, number of child domains in the forest etc.. and
location of Exchange servers in relation to users. Also if clients are using
applications that are directly dependent on
MS doesn't have any published guidance on this. Heck there
guidance is still specific to identical proc to identical proc. Anyone not
running identical procs in DCs and Exchange have to swag it by number of cycles.
But this breaks down when comparing AMD to intel especially when Hyperthreadin
