Latest official release

Hi, may I know whether the latest official activemq release is 4.0.2? May I know when is the released date of it as well? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Latest-official-release-tf2717760.html#a7577432 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at

Re: Latest official release

On 11/28/06, nabble615 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, may I know whether the latest official activemq release is 4.0.2? Currently yes. The 4.1 release is still in voting; its looking good so hopefully should pass in the next day or so May I know when is the released date of it as well?

[jira] Commented: (AMQCPP-14) CMSExpiration not handled properly in ActiveMQProducer

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-14?page=comments#action_37573 ] Nathan Mittler commented on AMQCPP-14: -- Another issue was found in that the MessageConsumer's receive() method does not seem to take message expiration

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=comments#action_37576 ] james strachan commented on AMQ-1054: - Just to make absolutely sure, I've added the test case into the 4.0 branch too

[jira] Created: (AMQ-1074) support JDBC master slave on MySQL

support JDBC master slave on MySQL -- Key: AMQ-1074 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1074 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: james strachan Fix For:

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=comments#action_37578 ] Guy Pardon commented on AMQ-1054: - James, FYI: I am seeing this exactly on OSX/Unix myself. What I can do is upload the whole thing as a ZIP (if you say

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=comments#action_37579 ] Shoaib Akhtar commented on AMQ-1054: Hi James, It is quite amazing that you cannot reproduce the problem Guy mentioned. Anyhow i am using Sun JDK 1.5.0.9

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=comments#action_37580 ] james strachan commented on AMQ-1054: - Hi Guy Just to be sure - are you saying the bug doesn't happen for you on OSX/Unix? i.e. its a windows only bug? XA

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=comments#action_37581 ] james strachan commented on AMQ-1054: - Shoaib - I wonder could you try using ActiveMQ trunk (or tomorrows nightly snapshot build of 4.2-SNAPSHOT) to see if

Re: (AMQ 992) DefaultDatabaseLocker and mysql

On 11/21/06, slotito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to get MySQL to work in the Master/Slave JDBC configuration - the default sql does not lock the table properly. I added a MysqlJDBCAdapter that extends org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.adapter.DefaultJDBCAdapter so I could override

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1074) support JDBC master slave on MySQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1074?page=comments#action_37583 ] james strachan commented on AMQ-1074: - Patch applied to trunk - which seems to work for me with MySQL Connector/J 5.0.4. support JDBC master slave on MySQL

[jira] Created: (AMQ-1075) support for FileMessage interface to support in-band and out-of-band file transfer

support for FileMessage interface to support in-band and out-of-band file transfer -- Key: AMQ-1075 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1075 Project:

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=comments#action_37586 ] Shoaib Akhtar commented on AMQ-1054: Hi James, Sorry i could not see your post before i posted my comment. If it is fixed may i ask whats the timeline for it

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=all ] james strachan resolved AMQ-1054. - Fix Version/s: 4.2.0 Resolution: Fixed Aha! So the reason the test case was working that I checked into trunk and 4.0 branch was due to the fact

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=comments#action_37589 ] james strachan commented on AMQ-1054: - Have backported the test case and fix to 4.1 branch too if we release a new bug fix release of 4.1 before 4.2 XA

Heap overflow after consumer closes

This is with the Kaha store and the store durable pending cursor. Messages size is 10 kilobytes. Heap size set to 512MB. activemq.xml configured for 100 MB. 1. Start a consumer for a durable topic and stop it immediately. 2. Wait until 5 messages have been enqueued. 3. Start the producer

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1054) XA recover fails for 4.0.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1054?page=comments#action_37597 ] Shoaib Akhtar commented on AMQ-1054: Hi James, Thanks for the fixed bug and thanks to Guy Pardon as well for reporting this issue. Last nigh i saw the patch

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-1070) Deadlock in Queue.java

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1070?page=all ] Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1070. - Fix Version/s: 4.2.0 Resolution: Fixed Locking behaviour has changed for 4.2 - can now longer reproduce this Deadlock in Queue.java