Hiram,
BTW, did you run the activemq-cpp cpp-unit tests against the broker with the
new stomp transport? I took a look at your code and it looks like you still
have the request-id/response-id headers in there, so it should work fine.
Looks a lot simpler - easier to find your way around.
Nate
On
It all looks good to me. Given we've already hit AMQ-793 recently...
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-793
due to the flow control issues in the stomp implementation under load,
I'd say lets get rid of the old version and go with the new.
On 7/2/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Howdy STOMP developers,
Just wantted to let you know that I spent the day doing some major
refactoring to the STOMP server side protocol implementation in ActiveMQ.
The previous implementation did all the work inside a WireFormat layer. The
poll model that it imposed made some things difficult t
