+1
On 7/4/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These are all good questions.. And that's why I kinda was think a branch
would be good since it would alow folks to go crazy figuring out the best
solution and not have to work about breaking things while the changes are in
progress.
On 7/4
These are all good questions.. And that's why I kinda was think a branch
would be good since it would alow folks to go crazy figuring out the best
solution and not have to work about breaking things while the changes are in
progress.
On 7/4/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/4/0
On 7/4/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is there is a high likelyhood that we will need to also extend
the MessageStore interface to provide some cursoring ablilities. So the
change is not going to just be sefcontained in the broker region package.
Ah I see - in that ca
The problem is there is a high likelyhood that we will need to also extend
the MessageStore interface to provide some cursoring ablilities. So the
change is not going to just be sefcontained in the broker region package.
On 7/4/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you totally conv
Are you totally convinced it requires a new branch; e.g. what if we
created a whole new Region implementation in another package or
something?
On 7/4/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that fixing these issues are going to require substancial work on
internals of the broker. I
I think that fixing these issues are going to require substancial work on
internals of the broker. I want to try to take a stab fixing this stuff but
since it's going to take a few iterations to get right, how about we branch
trunk and work there to avoid breaking everbody else? Any sugestions f
