One of the things I do is maintain the execution version of PERL in a root
directory starting with
perl\
Old versions I save as
perl-v5-3\
perl-v5-6\
When I want to go back I rename the root directory to
perl\
My environment for PERL always points to the
In the future, I think it would be better if you place the script in an
accessible location (WWW) or attached it. Normally, attachments are bad, but a
long script with very long lines is worse as a body.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 08:01:39AM -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
I am hoping someone
here is the file (attached) thanks for any input!
rememeber - i inherited this and would like to make it a lot better than it
is :) thanks sooo much for any input!
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo SIGNES [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:15 AM
To: Jennifer
Hi,
I am sorry but I am not a programmer and I have no
knowledge in C.
I use Perl but every time, people get interest in my
program and want it. I am trying to make it fast.
I am parsing a text file that contains instances and
wires linking these instances.
I have millions of signals and I
I couldn't get it to compile readily. I'd recommend adding -w (or use warnings) and
use strict. Once you modify the code so that it works with those pragmas, your bug
may very well become obvious, or disappear altogether.
Chris
At 08:01 AM 10/9/2002 -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
I am
Hello,
Although I'm not an expert I suspect you will be faster doing
$SIGNALS{$SIGNALNAME}= {isINPUTof=[$1], isOUTPUTof=[$2]};
instead of predeclaring memory pushing onto arrays. The above line should
do all of that in one.
Also, no need to test for existence of the key if you are happy
Thank you for your help.
That is what I expect.
I have done some benchmarking on smaller files but I
did not see any time difference between the 2 coding
styles.
I am just wondering if these 2 codes are interpreted
in the same way by perl when it uilts its bytecode.
Selim.
--- [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Alan Dickey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XML::Parser...Example Code...
Adym Lincoln wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone know where I can find example code using the XML::Parser module? I've been
Is this it? http://www.xml.com/pub/a/98/09/xml-perl.html
It is dated for 4 years ago, given the rapid evolution of XML I don't know how useful
it will be. I found it by searching google for Using the Perl XML::Parser, quotes
included.
Chris
Alan,
Good articles, but none touch on the
From: Tonuzi Selim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am sorry but I am not a programmer and I have no
knowledge in C.
Being a programmer and knowing C are two completely unrelated things. I'm even
inclined to say that not
knowing C makes you a better programmer.
I am parsing a text file that contains
-Original Message-
From: Chris Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Adym Lincoln; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: XML::Parser...Example Code...
Is this it? http://www.xml.com/pub/a/98/09/xml-perl.html
Chris,
Looks like the one. The links to
From: Tonuzi Selim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is what I expect.
I have done some benchmarking on smaller files but I
did not see any time difference between the 2 coding
styles.
I am just wondering if these 2 codes are interpreted
in the same way by perl when it uilts its
I am new to the Perl and I am attempting to perform the following task which
I am unsure about.
I have a server which I want to recursively identify all the files on given
a starting point (i.e. D:\Data). After I identify these files, I want to
identify the NTFS permissions places on the
From what you provided, it looks like this module uses the default mail
program to send mail. Does, in fact /usr/bin/Mail exist? What happens when
you try to execute it outside of perl?
(BTW, this does sound rather platform specific)
\\Greg Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
