PPM.xml has gone

2003-06-09 Thread Neil MacMullen
I've just upgraded from 5.6.1 to 5.8.0 (on windows) and discovered that PPM has been completely rewritten. That's fine except that some automated install scripts on one of my projects no longer work. I used to be able to do something along the lines of use PPM ; PPM::InstallPackage('p

RE: slurping in win xp vs hpux

2003-06-09 Thread Adym Lincoln
>-Original Message- >From: intertwingled [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:30 AM >To: Beau E. Cox >Cc: $Bill Luebkert; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: slurping in win xp vs hpux > >Must be that 15 lines of SCO codes that makes all >the difference here. > >Tony O

Re: slurping in win xp vs hpux

2003-06-09 Thread intertwingled
Must be that 15 lines of SCO codes that makes all the difference here. Tony "Beau E. Cox" wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "$Bill Luebkert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 3:37 AM > Subject: Re: slurping in win xp vs hpux > > > Ron Hartikk

RE: slurping in win xp vs hpux

2003-06-09 Thread Mike Kalinovich
Could also be simple things like disk I/O (faster disk), bus speeds, ram differences, etc etc. MK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of $Bill Luebkert Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: slurping in win xp vs hpux

Re: slurping in win xp vs hpux

2003-06-09 Thread Beau E. Cox
- Original Message - From: "$Bill Luebkert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 3:37 AM Subject: Re: slurping in win xp vs hpux > Ron Hartikka wrote: > > I have a script that slurps a couple of 10-20 MB files and then > > processes them. > > > > On my

Re: slurping in win xp vs hpux

2003-06-09 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: "Ron Hartikka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have a script that slurps a couple of 10-20 MB files and then > processes them. > > On my newish xp laptop, the slurps take around 150 of the 200 sec run > time. > > On the oldish HPUX ws the slurps take around 20 of the 500 sec run > time. > > So, my

Re: slurping in win xp vs hpux

2003-06-09 Thread $Bill Luebkert
Ron Hartikka wrote: > I have a script that slurps a couple of 10-20 MB files and then > processes them. > > On my newish xp laptop, the slurps take around 150 of the 200 sec run time. > > On the oldish HPUX ws the slurps take around 20 of the 500 sec run time. > > So, my UX processor is slower b

slurping in win xp vs hpux

2003-06-09 Thread Ron Hartikka
I have a script that slurps a couple of 10-20 MB files and then processes them.   On my newish xp laptop, the slurps take around 150 of the 200 sec run time. On the oldish HPUX ws the slurps take around 20 of the 500 sec run time.   So, my UX processor is slower but maybe has a better

Getting data out of a table in MSWord

2003-06-09 Thread Evan Morris
Hi all Is there a way to get data out of a table in MSWord? Are MSWord tables treated as logical, cellular objects like Excel tables? What modules should I use? All help appreciated. Evan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] +27 11 792 2777 (t) +27 11 792 2711 (f) - Is /usr/b

Capture the connect exception (MySQL)

2003-06-09 Thread Sinitcin Vitali
Title: Capture the connect exception (MySQL) Hi all, The following snip works fine for me, BUT 1. I'm concerning, is that the right way to catch the 'connect' exception/s? 2. Are there other manners to do it? use strict; use DBI; my ($hostname, $database, $username, $password, $port) = …