Re: perlapp

2005-12-27 Thread Foo Ji-Haw
Octavian Rasnita wrote: Oh yes, but Java can be crypted... I mean not crypted, there is another term for that kind of code manipulation for not allowing others to get it. You mean obfuscation. Yeah well that works more to deter than outright prevention. Wait for Perl 6. It will compile every

Re: perlapp

2005-12-27 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Oh yes, but Java can be crypted... I mean not crypted, there is another term for that kind of code manipulation for not allowing others to get it. I think I understand why the guys from ActiveState don't answer these questions. The source code is protected only by hiding it, so if a bad guy finds

RE: perlapp

2005-12-27 Thread Sandeep Deshpande
I use perl2exe software's evaluation version to create Perl executables. However I haven't tried to break it. I don't know how secure it is. Thanks & Regards, Sandeep Deshpande -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Foo Ji-Haw Sent: Wednesday, Decem

Re: perlapp

2005-12-27 Thread Foo Ji-Haw
I think your question has been asked periodically, and it seems that there are no good answers available to date. All of us product people have the same concerns. If it is any consolation to you, Java is just as easy to decompile. I've seen my guys do it before me. Octavian Rasnita wrote:

Brett Carroll is out of the office.

2005-12-27 Thread Brett . Carroll
I will be out of the office starting 12/27/2005 and will not return until 01/03/2006. I will respond to your message when I return. If you need immediate action please contact the BPD helpdesk at (304) 480- ___ ActivePerl mailing list ActivePerl@l

Re: A Suspicious Regexp

2005-12-27 Thread Williamawalters
In a message dated 12/27/2005 5:24:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Wizards (if there's any around this week), > > > > I've got a regexp I'm using to replace one SID in an HKEY_USERS registry > > key with another, but I'm beginning to suspec

Re: Best module for sending e-mail?

2005-12-27 Thread Octavian Rasnita
From: "Brian H. Oak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Robert, > > Thanks for the suggestion, but Mail::Sender fails pretty soon down the > list of requirements: Mail::Sender can only send mail to a server on > port 25/TCP. As far as I can tell, Mail::Sender only fulfills the > first item on the requirement

perlapp

2005-12-27 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Hi, I want to create Windows executables with perlapp and distribute them to others. I heard that the code is "somehow protected" but what does this mean? How hard is to break that protection and find the code? Is the code kept in memory from where it can be dumped? Can it be found in clear ther

Re: Best module for sending e-mail?

2005-12-27 Thread DZ-Jay
On Dec 27, 2005, at 16:13, Brian H. Oak wrote: Thanks for the suggestion, but Mail::Sender fails pretty soon down the list of requirements: Mail::Sender can only send mail to a server on port 25/TCP. As far as I can tell, Mail::Sender only fulfills the first item on the requirements list. Th

Re: A Suspicious Regexp

2005-12-27 Thread $Bill Luebkert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Wizards (if there's any around this week), > > I've got a regexp I'm using to replace one SID in an HKEY_USERS registry > key with another, but I'm beginning to suspect there's something wrong > with it. It does work, but in fiddling with it, I discovered that it > s

RE: Best module for sending e-mail?

2005-12-27 Thread Brian H. Oak
Robert, Thanks for the suggestion, but Mail::Sender fails pretty soon down the list of requirements: Mail::Sender can only send mail to a server on port 25/TCP. As far as I can tell, Mail::Sender only fulfills the first item on the requirements list. These are exactly the kinds of shortcomings t

A Suspicious Regexp

2005-12-27 Thread Deane . Rothenmaier
Wizards (if there's any around this week), I've got a regexp I'm using to replace one SID in an HKEY_USERS registry key with another, but I'm beginning to suspect there's something wrong with it. It does work, but in fiddling with it, I discovered that it still works when it shouldn't (I think).

RE: Best module for sending e-mail?

2005-12-27 Thread Hicks, Robert
> Here's my requirement list: > > >> Must stand alone, not rely on any MTA on localhost > > >> Must be configurable for SMTP server and port > > >> Must be SMTP AUTH capable > > >> Must auto-negotiate TLS when it's available > > >> Must be able to use SSL when so configured > > >> Must work w

Best module for sending e-mail?

2005-12-27 Thread Brian H. Oak
Hi all, I need to send automated e-mail reports from Windows boxes, with no sendmail or other MTA available. I've tried several modules so far and, although I've been able to mostly make them work, none of them has satisfied all of my requirements -- much less my admittedly idealistic wishes. Pl

Re: SCCS in Linux

2005-12-27 Thread Anthony R. Nemmer
SCCS is the Source Code Control System, the precursor to CVS, and at one time I think that CVS was built on top of SCCS, but that might not be true any more... Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Sandeep Deshpande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: How can I install SCCS in Linux, is there any documen