Re: messy regex

2006-04-10 Thread Williamawalters
In a message dated 4/10/2006 3:43:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:   > William,> > Thanks for the code.  This approach is new to me and very interesting.> > I am trying to work with> “2418 23rd, 3/1/cp Storage, $675/mo+Bills, $500/dep, 1500sf, Great Deal! 806-632-403

PUT and GET property of WEBDAV

2006-04-10 Thread usaravanan
I need sample code for Put and GET property in WEBDAV tool with perl script i.e ; PUT property => Uploads file from local system to remote server with authentication GET property => vice versa of PUT; Downloads files from remote server to local system; Both the above things are not working

Re: Nitpicky array questions

2006-04-10 Thread $Bill Luebkert
Alan M. Carroll wrote: > Apparently I wrote it badly, but my question concerning scalar vs. $#array > was whether there was a difference in run-time costs, not the functional > difference. > > I don't have a specific issue, but code can always run faster. The question > is whether I should use

RE: "Broken" links in HTML help

2006-04-10 Thread Jan Dubois
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Michael Tempest wrote: Hi Michael, > A few weeks ago I took the bold step of upgrading from Perl 5.6.1 to > Perl 5.8.8 (Build 816). All in all, it went better than I expected. Build 816 has some significant problems, especially on Windows, so I want to encourage you to upgra

RE: Inherited ActivePerl installation without ppm

2006-04-10 Thread Dick, Brian E.
Title: Message Thanks for your help. I was able to get the latest version of ActivePerl and DBD-Oracle working with Oracle 10.1. I had to do the following.   - Remove Oracle's perl from the PATH. - Remove Oracle's PERL5LIB environment variable. - Remove ActivePerl's bin\oci.dll. - Remove Ac

RE: Nitpicky array questions

2006-04-10 Thread Brian Raven
Alan M. Carroll <> wrote: > Apparently I wrote it badly, but my question concerning scalar vs. > $#array was whether there was a difference in run-time costs, not the > functional difference. > > I don't have a specific issue, but code can always run faster. The > question is whether I should us

RE: Nitpicky array questions

2006-04-10 Thread Alan M. Carroll
Apparently I wrote it badly, but my question concerning scalar vs. $#array was whether there was a difference in run-time costs, not the functional difference. I don't have a specific issue, but code can always run faster. The question is whether I should use scalar() without concern, or whether

Re: ActivePerl Digest, Vol 27, Issue 14

2006-04-10 Thread Josh . Perlmutter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/09/2006 02:25:18 PM: > Today's Topics: >2. messy regex (Gerald Preston) > -- > -- > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 09:32:36 -0500 > From: "Gerald Preston" <[EMAI

"Broken" links in HTML help

2006-04-10 Thread Michael Tempest
Hi A few weeks ago I took the bold step of upgrading from Perl 5.6.1 to Perl 5.8.8 (Build 816). All in all, it went better than I expected. Congratulations to Perl and ActiveState! However, the generated HTML help has many broken or missing links. perlfunc.html is an excellent example. The tabl

RE: Nitpicky array questions

2006-04-10 Thread Brian Raven
Alan M. Carroll <> wrote: > I went netsearching for this but couldn't find anything in all the > noise. > > 1) What is the runtime cost of the scalar operator? Is it constant or > does it depend on the size of the array? Is it different than > $#array? Evaluating an array in a scalar context r