At 09:41 AM 2/5/02 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Steve,
>Just a quick question on NT service. Do you find it easier (and faster)
>if
>ActivePerl is setup as a service versus a standard .exe? I have always
>wondered which one operates more efficiently, more stable and faster?
I haven't reall
At 03:29 AM 2/1/02 +, Serge Dergham wrote:
>Script run fine from command promp, But not when called by an NT service.
>This is not a script problem, perl itself is not running.
>Tried to change account used by the service, tried system, administrator,
>...
>nothing helped
>Would appreciate an
At 01:29 PM 12/3/01 -0500, Eric Logeson wrote:
>When I issue the following:
>perlsvc -s my.pl -e my.exe -f -c
>the script compiles without error, but when I run my.exe no service is
>installed...is this what is supposed to happen or when my.exe is executed
>is it supposed to install a service...
So, is there an easy way that I'm missing to use Net::FTP to test for the
existence of a directory on a server? I know I can try to use cwd(dirname)
and check for failure, or get the contents of the current directory and
parse the results looking for the directory I want. I can check the time
At 01:42 PM 5/11/01 -0400, Mark Riehl wrote:
>How many people are using the Active State Perl Development Kit? Do you
>like it? What's the best feature? Worst feature? Would you buy it
>again?
For the project I'm working on, we are going to distribute an application
to many client machines,
At 03:07 AM 2/2/01 -0500, Kirkup, Steve wrote:
>I am trying to upgrade to the most current build of ActivePerl ( 623 ) but
>when I run the installation
>I just get a "Installation ended Prematurely error, your system has not been
>modified."
Are you logged in with an account that has Administrato
