DZ-Jay wrote:
Yes. And as a bonus, I don't have to separate the sections by commas
because each block will be executed in turn, and its return value
(usually 1, or maybe even a reference to its closure) is taken as an
argument to the previous block, so
try {} CATCH {} FINALLY {};
is the e
David Nicol wrote:
On 1/19/06, DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello:
This might sound like a stupid question,
I'm guessing that your current syntax works because
you have declared prototypes for CATCH and POST
of (\&) which coerces the block given as their arguments
into a coderef?
On 1/19/06, DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
> This might sound like a stupid question,
I'm guessing that your current syntax works because
you have declared prototypes for CATCH and POST
of (\&) which coerces the block given as their arguments
into a coderef?
A pretty big synt
Hello:
This might sound like a stupid question, but I thought I'd ask anyway
just in case there is some hidden magic in Perl that I am not aware of.
My question is this:
I am attempting to write an Exception handler class for Perl 5.x (don't
ask why, lets just say its an experiment or test
