On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:42 AM, 'Evgeniy Stepanov' via address-sanitizer <
address-sanitizer@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Konstantin Serebryany
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Yuri Gribov
> wrote:
> >>> there are downsides: one bug may trigger anoth
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Konstantin Serebryany
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote:
>>> there are downsides: one bug may trigger another report
>>
>> Doesn't UBSan have the same problem?
>
> Maybe, but ubsan reports totally different kinds of bugs.
> Note that I a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote:
>> there are downsides: one bug may trigger another report
>
> Doesn't UBSan have the same problem?
Maybe, but ubsan reports totally different kinds of bugs.
Note that I am not opposed to -fsanitize-recover in tsan and msan
(it's there already)
> there are downsides: one bug may trigger another report
Doesn't UBSan have the same problem?
> the user will spend time investigating more reports than needed.
True but that would be a concious trade-off.
>>> It will create more problems to users and developers than it will solve.
>>
>> Agree
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote:
>> What are your reasons?
>
> Collect more memory errors from a single run. E.g. I have an
> "embedded" system at hand which requires at least 20m for typical
> fix-compile-run cycle (and some steps like reflashing the device are
> manual). Bein
> What are your reasons?
Collect more memory errors from a single run. E.g. I have an
"embedded" system at hand which requires at least 20m for typical
fix-compile-run cycle (and some steps like reflashing the device are
manual). Being able to fix more than one error at once would
significantly re
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Yuri Gribov wrote:
> All,
>
> Are there plans to extend -fsanitize-recover beyond UBSan? It seems
> that adding this functionality to e.g. ASan would be trivial.
I do not plan to add such functionality to asan and I am strongly
opposed to it.
It will create more
All,
Are there plans to extend -fsanitize-recover beyond UBSan? It seems
that adding this functionality to e.g. ASan would be trivial.
-Y
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"address-sanitizer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em
