Hi,
I am trying to use the dataflow sanitizer with the address sanitizer, but
they clash together giving me a long sequence of errors due to multiple
definitions in both sanitizers:
clang-llvm/ninja-build-clang/lib/clang/5.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.dfsan-x86_64.a(interception_linux.cc.o):
In
Hi,
these tools were not designed to work together. It could be possible
to hack something, but it does not sound easy. In particular, they use
different techniques for intercepting libc calls and it's not clear to
me how one would tie them together.
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:52 AM, hariri via ad
Thanks for your reply Evgeniy.
> It could be possible
to hack something, but it does not sound easy
Could you please give me some pointers into what needs to be hacked to make
this possible?
> it's not clear to
me how one would tie them together.
The scenario is the following: I am using l
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:26 PM, hariri via address-sanitizer
wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Evgeniy.
>
>> It could be possible
> to hack something, but it does not sound easy
>
> Could you please give me some pointers into what needs to be hacked to make
> this possible?
A few problems come to mi
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:52 PM, 'Evgenii Stepanov' via address-sanitizer <
address-sanitizer@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:26 PM, hariri via address-sanitizer
> wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply Evgeniy.
> >
> >> It could be possible
> > to hack something, but it does not sou
