Re: [BoundsChecking] What about it?

2016-05-10 Thread tetra2005x
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 12:13:30 AM UTC+3, pierre.gagelin wrote: > > Hi, > > I am a French last year student in internship with a researcher from the > Portsmouth university (UK). We began to work on memory security by looking > at a research publication which make reference to AddressSanit

Re: Gentoo with ASAN

2016-01-26 Thread tetra2005x
Are you going to post to oss-security BTW? On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 11:59:05 AM UTC+3, tetra...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 3:52:40 AM UTC+3, Hanno Böck wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've been working on this for a while now and finally am able to share >> it in a reason

Re: Gentoo with ASAN

2016-01-26 Thread tetra2005x
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 3:52:40 AM UTC+3, Hanno Böck wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been working on this for a while now and finally am able to share > it in a reasonably usable way: > I have created a Gentoo System with almost everything (except gcc, > glibc and a few deps) with asan: > > ht

Re: "check_initialization_order=true" command line option?

2016-01-14 Thread tetra2005x
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 8:21:11 PM UTC+3, Yuri Gribov wrote: > > BTW could someone mention __asan_default_options in > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerFlags ? > Can't do this from my home email. > Done in https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSaniti

Re: AddressSanitizer and issue suppression

2014-10-24 Thread tetra2005x
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Alexander Potapenko > wrote: > We just need a separate error reporting function that'll be called >> exclusively from interceptors. It doesn't have to be noreturn, because the >> interceptors themselves aren't. >> > Sounds like a match for __asan_report_*_noabor