Ok, this sounds reasonable.
The annotations-stuff would of course be great.
regards,
Martin
On 10/16/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
You don't want the validator to be on the component with
the values - once you've said that it's cross-component validation,
that's just not
I pretty much like the omnibus thing for things like that.
We already had that in Trinidad as well, when I did all the
renaming and refactoring.
-M
On 10/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for applying this rule to all
So shall I create a JIRA issue for this?
Thanks
- Pavitra
-Original Message-
From: Simon Lessard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:40 PM
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: commandNavigationItem - recommend changing 2 properties
In case of train
Hello, I would like to propose adding a 'visited' attribute to the
commandNavigationItem component. This attribute is relevant only when used
within the train component. We currently have an inaccurate way of figuring
out if a stop has been visited or not. The renderer gets the row index of
+1
Jeanne Waldman wrote:
+1. This sounds good to me. I've always wanted the model to control
visited.
Pavitra Subramaniam wrote:
Hello, I would like to propose adding a 'visited' attribute to the
commandNavigationItem component. This attribute is relevant only when
used within the train
Hey,
any one care to make IntegerUtils from trinidad-impl part of the public API?
I like to use it in the api, when working on the validator/converter
*overhaul* issue(s).
the javadoc says:
Class containing various integer utilities. It caches commonly
used Integer objects and String
+1
On 10/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
any one care to make IntegerUtils from trinidad-impl part of the public API?
I like to use it in the api, when working on the validator/converter
*overhaul* issue(s).
the javadoc says:
Class containing various integer
+1
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On 10/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
any one care to make IntegerUtils from trinidad-impl part of the
public API?
I like to use it in the api, when working on the validator/converter
*overhaul* issue(s).
the javadoc says:
Class
+1
On 10/17/06, Jeanne Waldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't realize until now that registerStyleSheet wasn't in the public
Skin API. It's only in SkinImpl.
I'd like to add it to the Skin's APIs so that custom component
developers can register skin
definitions for their custom components to
Hello,
To fix a commandButton ,presently not rendering on a Pocket IE or IE Mobile
browser, I changed the following agent capability in pocketie.xml from 'true'
to 'false'
capability name=-adfinternal-advancedForms value=false/
When I built with tests OFF, it worked fine - button displayed
I don't know, but I'd try doing a 'mvn clean' first. Did you do this?
What were the golden file diffs? Maybe that will give a clue.
Piyush Hari wrote:
Hello,
To fix a commandButton ,presently not rendering on a Pocket IE or IE Mobile
browser, I changed the following agent capability in
I did mvn clean but it did not do any good.
-Piyush
- Original Message -
From: Jeanne Waldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: Build Error - test failure
I don't know, but I'd try doing a 'mvn clean' first.
surefire plugin is containing.
changed something in the (j)unit test(s) ?
try to skip the test ...
(just for the case )
On 10/17/06, Piyush Hari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did mvn clean but it did not do any good.
-Piyush
- Original Message -
From: Jeanne Waldman [EMAIL
surefire plugin is containing.
changed something in the (j)unit test(s) ?
What do you mean by this ?
try to skip the test ...
(just for the case )
I did. Skipping tests works fine. But, I want to do the tests as I am
submitting the patch for an issue that should include test changes
in the -impl there is a target folder
surefire reports
test failer
some folder like that may contain more infos
On 10/17/06, Piyush Hari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not change any test. I guess my change causes some error in the tests
already in place. Is there a way to detect that ?
Thanks Mathias. surefire-reports under -impl provided me the key.
href was being added twice for a goButton tag when rendered as an input HTML
element.
Thanks,
-Piyush
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent:
16 matches
Mail list logo