Re: [vote] release of plugins (1.0.0-incubating)

2007-02-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Thanks for your feedback. I will add the src/site thing. But in the meantime, I have these question: Why is the source-plugin adding the target/ ? Why is this: build resources resource directorysrc/main/resources/directory /resource !-- also include license and notice

Re: [vote] release of plugins (1.0.0-incubating)

2007-02-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hey Martin, is there a need that we need to have the NOTICE, LICENSE and INCUBATOR.TXT in $basedir} ? When moving them to src/resource/meta-inf they are in the META-INF of the -source jar and the *real* jar. But still not inside the javadoc-JAR. Any idea ? -M On 2/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf

Re: [vote] release of plugins (1.0.0-incubating)

2007-02-20 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Sources and javadoc probably don't reuse that information and to be honest I don't know how well the source-plugin and javadoc-plugin is configurable with this (have to dig into this) Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Thanks for your feedback. I will add the src/site thing. But in

Re: [vote] release of plugins (1.0.0-incubating)

2007-02-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I just pinged the maven list. Looks like the Source plugin has the javadoc jar containing the mentioned files -M On 2/20/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sources and javadoc probably don't reuse that information and to be honest I don't know how well the source-plugin and

Re: [vote] release of plugins (1.0.0-incubating)

2007-02-20 Thread Martin van den Bemt
I don't mind having it in the the META-INF directory btw.. Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Martin, is there a need that we need to have the NOTICE, LICENSE and INCUBATOR.TXT in $basedir} ? When moving them to src/resource/meta-inf they are in the META-INF of the -source jar

Re: [vote] release of plugins (1.0.0-incubating)

2007-02-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Ok, Martin I fixed those things http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage/ Once we get the approval from the Incubator PMC guys, I'd like to test/use this tool for doing the copy: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Repository+Tools -Matthias On 2/19/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL

Re: Oracle Skin Release

2007-02-20 Thread Scott O'Bryan
I don't know why we couldn't have a skin repository on Trinidad personally. If for nothing else but to provide examples to help people skin the product. Scott Simon Lessard wrote: Hmm I don't know. I would have liked to see it hosted as a new Trinidad project, a bit like trinidad-demo so

Re: using trinidad as non-default render-kit

2007-02-20 Thread Stefan Podkowinski
Hi Adam I already have trinidad working with facelets. The problem is it only runs with trinidad as the *default rendering kit*. Defining trinidad as the rendering kit per page does *not* work. Please see my first mail for details. On 2/19/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, I see.

Re: [vote] release of plugins (1.0.0-incubating)

2007-02-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
btw. the javadoc jar issue is triggered by a bug inside of the plugin. Martin, do you bring the vote up to [EMAIL PROTECTED], once you voted +1 :) Thanks, Matthias On 2/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, Martin I fixed those things http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage/

Re: using trinidad as non-default render-kit

2007-02-20 Thread Adam Winer
Yep, re-reading it, that's exactly what you said. Sorry for the misunderstanding. So this is a tougher nut to crack. I can imagine some hacks to try to instantiate the rendering context on the fly, but nothing really obvious and bulletproof comes to mind. I think we need a JIRA issue... --