Re: Client-side validation - enhance to match server-side

2007-04-20 Thread Danny Robinson
Does anyone have any feedback on this patch? I don't expect it is perfect or complete, but I'd like to understand if this is the approach you'd expect for implementing this feature. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-391 On 3/16/07, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK,

Re: Client-side validation - enhance to match server-side

2007-04-20 Thread Adam Winer
Sorry - I've been wanting to have a look at it, but been generally swamped. Hopefully soon... -- Adam On 4/20/07, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have any feedback on this patch? I don't expect it is perfect or complete, but I'd like to understand if this is the approach

Re: MessageBundleTest._validateBundleParams

2007-04-20 Thread Adam Winer
Ah, I see. It gives warnings for missing keys, but errors when the set of parameters don't match up. Yeah, I guess disabling it is the simplest answer. -- Adam On 4/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It fails Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,031 sec

Re: MessageBundleTest._validateBundleParams

2007-04-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
That is my guess as well, at least before disabling a test, I need to ask the group ;-) Thanks, Matthias On 4/20/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, I see. It gives warnings for missing keys, but errors when the set of parameters don't match up. Yeah, I guess disabling it is the

Re: ADFFACES-459 - to trunk only?

2007-04-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
committed -M On 4/19/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should apply the 1.2 patch immediately, because it's for a different file - transform12.xsl instead of transform.xsl. -- Adam On 4/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi * I applied the ADFFACES-459

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Trinidad Impl

2007-04-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
even a fresh, clean, naked, whatever checkout on my box, didn't cause the issue. some (random?) continuum failures ?! On 4/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ähm, can anyone test ? I am not seeing this on my box On 4/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Trinidad Impl

2007-04-20 Thread Simon Lessard
We... broken English... Should have been maybe you forgot to add a file with latest patch? On 4/20/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try right away, did you forget to add a file with a patch maybe? On 4/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: even a fresh,

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Trinidad Impl

2007-04-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
no worries, I can't speak English as well. But, I added a file. -Matthias On 4/20/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We... broken English... Should have been maybe you forgot to add a file with latest patch? On 4/20/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try right

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Trinidad Impl

2007-04-20 Thread Simon Lessard
Hello Matthias, I could reproduce a compilation error but not the ones you mentioned, only GoButtonFacesBeanTest failed here : java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.bean.UIXFacesBeanImpl cannot be cast to org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.uinode.UINodeFacesBean