Re: Directory to restore not visible from GUI

2001-08-23 Thread Garrison, Tony
We have seen this problem occasionally, but only when we try to do a Point-In-Time restore. -Original Message- From: Gilles Danan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Directory to restore not visible from

Re: TSM 4.2 client and UNICODE

2001-08-23 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
Zoltan, Your posts ARE getting through. But you cannot force anybody to answer you - you can ask your colleagues for help hoping that they would. If someone CAN help and WANTS to help you will get some answer based on his/her expertise. At least I got all your mailings even the re-post. Trying t

Re: TSM 4.2 server migration problem on NT

2001-08-23 Thread Joerg Pohlmann/CanWest/IBM
U/G to IE 5 did the trick. Thanks for your help, Andy. Joerg Pohlmann Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-08-22 17:55:21 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subj

Re: another select question part 2

2001-08-23 Thread David Longo
Do a: HELP Q ACTLOG for syntax. You can specify how many days/hours to go back in several ways. fir instance q actlog begind=-3 sea=ANRE. Won't go back further than number of actlogretention days as shown in q status. You can change this value with set actlogretention. q actlog by itsel

Re: another select question part 2

2001-08-23 Thread Prather, Wanda
It can only go back as far as your activity log is kept. Enter the command: q status And look for "activity log retention". That's how many days of activity log you have to work with. If you want to keep data longer, change it with SET ACTLOGRETENTION nnn where nnn is the number of days to kee

another select question part 2

2001-08-23 Thread Anderson, Michael - HMIS
When trying to do a select of the activity log, how do I get it to go back. My queries seem to only be getting the tail end of the log. Thanks again Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the so

Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch

2001-08-23 Thread Valerie Fisher
We do our mksysb's to the same tape drive that TSM uses. We bring down the TSM server so that it does not own the tape device anymore and then start the mksysb backup. Haven't had a problem with at all. Have tested this at our DR hotsite and works fine. -Original Message- From: Prather,

Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch

2001-08-23 Thread Prather, Wanda
Yes, Sorry, I should have mentioned these are SP nodes. The mksysb is pushed out to them from the Control workstation, which (I think) uses NIM. -Original Message- From: Richard L. Rhodes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Re: Are my posts getting through ?

2001-08-23 Thread Lindsay Morris
I tend to respond to short, specific questions. > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Are my posts getting through ? > > > I have as

Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch

2001-08-23 Thread Lindsay Morris
We've done that too - but instead of bringing down the whole server, we just took the drive offline and made it available to AIX. > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Valerie Fisher > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:00 PM > To: [E

Re: Are my posts getting through ?

2001-08-23 Thread Alex Paschal
Re: Beta Redhat 7.2 & ext3 I don't know, and I would have to assume from the lack of response that either nobody else has messed with it yet either, probably because it's beta and we're all busy with production issues, or whoever has messed with it doesn't read the list or doesn't want to sh

Re: License problem

2001-08-23 Thread Tom Tann{s
It's a known problem. APAR IC30965 is open on this. On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Maurice van 't Loo wrote: > Hi, > > When we want to register licenses on TSM 4.2.0.0, we can use a lic-file only ones, >so we can't get the number of licenses higher than 66 (50 + 10 + 5 + 1) > If i open the nodelock file

Are my posts getting through ?

2001-08-23 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
I have asked 3-questions in the past week and have not gotten a single response to any of them ! What gives !!! I get an acknowledgement from the LISTSERVER that says it got my message ? === Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University University Computing Center e

Re: Verification

2001-08-23 Thread Allen Barth
Here here! I suppose I might even be tempted to challenge the user to explaine why they believe the files on disk are valid an intact in the first place. Then I'd tell them their files are on RAID5 and enjoy the expressions. Al "Cook, Dwight E"

Re: Services in the Client

2001-08-23 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
You can use only one NODename for a machine (for step 1) Each Friday you can generate a backupset with 2 years retension (for step 2) And each last Friday (or each Friday) you can delete backupsets from previous month which are not made in the last week of the month (to adhere to requirement 3) Z

Another Select question

2001-08-23 Thread Anderson, Michael - HMIS
My question is how come if I issue the query event command it will show me the time the backup completed. However if I try to use a select command, the completed time is not an option. Is this true or am I missing something. Thanks again Mike Anderson Mic

Re: TSM mirroring again

2001-08-23 Thread Bandu Vibhute (GWB)
Kuli, Shark has RAID-5 storage, so in most cases it doesn't need mirroring. Depending upon configurations it has at least 2 hot-spare drives in each SSA loop. To make backup and recovery simpler we are doing Flash Copy of 2 TB database. If you want to know details please drop me a line. Thank yo

Re: Verification

2001-08-23 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
Why to rename the original ?!? Why not to rename the restored file !?! Look at TSM Quick Reference for the Backup-Archive Clients (or in Using the Backup-Archive Clients) : "DSMC REStore [FILE] [options] sourcefilespec|"sourcefilespec" [destinationfilespec] " You can use very simple script simila

Re: TDP for Domino for NT hangs

2001-08-23 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
What are the versions of Server/API Client/TDP, NT/2000, Domino? It works fine on our NT4SP6+Domino hotfix and Domino 5.03. API client is v4.1.0.0, server is v4.1.3.0 on AIX 4.3.3.5 and TDP is v1.1.1.0 How many database files do you have in mail directory and what is their total (or average) size?

TSM4.2 on OS/390 with IBM3494

2001-08-23 Thread Jozef Zatko
Hi *SMers, our customer wants to implement TSM on OS/390 with 3494 library. I would like to now some experiences with TSM4.2 on OS/390 with 3494 library. We have to decide between 4.1 and 4.2. Any experiences appreciated. Jozef Zatko Login a.s. Slovakia

Re: Missing Win2K System Object dates on TSM server (An Answer)

2001-08-23 Thread Andrew Raibeck
You don't mention which version of the client you are running, but this problem is documented by APAR IC29793. The problem is fixed in 4.1.3 (available now) and 4.2.1 (not yet available, but it's on the horizon). Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Tivoli Systems Tivoli Storage Manager Client Develo

Re: Verification

2001-08-23 Thread Cook, Dwight E
If they doubt this, then they basically doubt all networking... If someone wants verification, tell them to retrieve/restore the data to a different named file and compare the two. Dwight -Original Message- From: Matthew Large [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:

Missing Win2K System Object dates on TSM server (An Answer)

2001-08-23 Thread Kyle Kinzer
We are currently moving our servers from NT 4.0 to Win2K. As I monitored the backup of our first initial Win2K servers, I noticed the System Object filespace did not display a "Last Backup Completion Date/Time" on the TSM server. I was able to see successful completion of the System Objects in the

Re: ANS4031E error - TSM Client 4.2 and RH 7

2001-08-23 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I believe that I stand corrected. We certified on Red Hat 7.0 and 7.1, but if your distribution meets the basic kernel and other related requirements: Linux kernel 2.2.x(for x=13 or higher) or Linux kernel 2.4.x(for x=0 or higher) glib

Re: Verification

2001-08-23 Thread Matthew Large
Copy Serialisation would be set to SharedStatic, so that's not an issue. They just want more confirmation than TSM gives. The way he sees it is that TSM only verifies that the Server received the packets to create it - it doesn't confirm the integrity of the file. I mean, I trust it, but he doesn'

Re: ANS4031E error - TSM Client 4.2 and RH 7

2001-08-23 Thread David McClelland
Andy, You suggest below that TSM Client 4.2 for Linux requires Red Hat 7.x or higher. However, looking in the Readme file in the rpm distribution it suggests that the only real stipulation is that the Linux kernel version is 2.2.13 or higher, or 2.4.0 or higher. I have clients in my environment

Re: ANS4031E error

2001-08-23 Thread Andrew Raibeck
$)CI'm not sure why you aren't seeing any files get backed up (maybe none are eligible for backup?), but APAR IC29686 addresses the ANS4031E message. Here is the description of the APAR: = BEGIN APAR DESCRIPTION = ERROR DESCRIPTION: Customer tries to back up a fully qualified pat

TDP for MS SQL Version 2 - Changing Management Classes

2001-08-23 Thread William Degli-Angeli
If you have configured the management classes of your meta and data objects with different Copy Destinations, as suggested in the "Installation and User's Guide" - "TSM Policy Requirements and Recommendations", you should not change your management classes unless the new management classes of BOTH

Re: TSM 4.2 server migration problem on NT

2001-08-23 Thread Aloes consultant
Thank you very much Andy. After verifying prerequisite on the WEB, I saw my error. Indeed, after upgrading IE to version 5.0, TSM version 4.2 has been istalled succesfully. Best regards. --- Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The TSM 4.2 server requires Internet Explorer 5 or > high

Re: Archive/Compression

2001-08-23 Thread Richard Sims
... >So we backup 2 GB files in about 10 minutes, I think this is slow. >My question is: why is the difference between - the elapsed processing time >and the data transfer time - so big >We are compressing on the client as you see! ... Bert - You may have answered your own question. It obviously

Re: Select Question

2001-08-23 Thread Alan Davenport
Try this: select tabname,colname,remarks from columns order by tabname,colname Here is a sample output: TABNAMECOLNAMEREMARKS -- -- -- ACTLOG DATE_TIME Date/Time ACTLOG

Re: how to get rid of OLD ACTIVE file backups

2001-08-23 Thread Jeff Bach
The APIs don't always mark files inactive. Active files never go away. Rename a filespace, back it up again and delete the old backup. Jeff > -Original Message- > From: MC Matt Cooper (2838) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Archive/Compression

2001-08-23 Thread Hervé CHIBOIS
Hi Bert, there is a bug for the 'elapsed time' in one client version. What is your TSM client version on your big S70 ? rv - Original Message - From: "Bert Moonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:06 PM Subject: Archive/Compression > Hello

ANS4031E error

2001-08-23 Thread 김인엽
When I issued 'dsmc incr', the following error occured and there is no backup data.. Anybody know why?? Appreciate any suggestions.. client os: Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot) Kernel 2.2.14-5.0smp on an i686 tsm server ver: 4.1.3 tsm client: 4.1 ANS4031E Error processing '/': desti

Re: Archive/Compression

2001-08-23 Thread Jeff Bach
elapsed processing time is from start to finish data transfer time is just when data is being sent Client compressions is probably a good thing to do. Your network data transfer rate is good. What are your no -a settings, and ADSM tuning settings. I have found the newer ADSM code is faster also

Archive/Compression

2001-08-23 Thread Bert Moonen
Hello guys, We are runnig an adsm 3.1.2.90 server on AIX 4.3.3 and we have AIX clients 4.3. The clients are connected with 100MB Ethernet Full Duplex to the server. The client in this example is an S70, 12 GB Memory and 8 processors. We archive a lot of oracle database files and some output is;

Re: repetitive script stops at 1st RC=11

2001-08-23 Thread Alan Davenport
+ Hello all, + I am running TSM 4.1.3 on OS390. I am trying to run a batch job + that has a list of select commands to validate the contents of different + filespaces. If one of the filespaces is empty or the does not + have a match + for the select command I get the following message a

Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch

2001-08-23 Thread Richard L. Rhodes
How do you restore the mksysb that was done to disk and was backed up to TSM? The only way I know of to restore one is via NIM. Thanks Rick On 22 Aug 2001, at 14:22, Prather, Wanda wrote: > We do the mksysb's to disk. Then TSM backs them up. > Then we only need the tape version of mksysb for

Re: Mainframes

2001-08-23 Thread Toora, Kuli
Try : http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/ . They are the main players these days. -Original Message- From: Neelam Dwivedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 August 2001 11:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mainframes Hi all I need some basic info on types of mainframes, the

Mainframes

2001-08-23 Thread Neelam Dwivedi
Hi all I need some basic info on types of mainframes, their OS, models (company names), app. servers. and related details. Can you suggest me a site which gives a comprehensive info on this ? Regards Neelam ___NOTICE This electronic mail transmission

Re: how to get rid of OLD ACTIVE file backups

2001-08-23 Thread MC Matt Cooper (2838)
Hello Again, One of the things I forgot to mention was I do a FULL backup, (change the copymode to ABSOLUTE), of every node every two weeks. I don't do them all at the same time but because I do the fulls I would expect that I would not be finding backup files that are 120 days old and AC

Re: TSM Bare Restore AIX Different Arch

2001-08-23 Thread Dave Z
Steve, Excellent idea! Keep me updated... Thanks! DaveZ Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LD.GOV.AU>cc: Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: TSM Bar

Re: Verification

2001-08-23 Thread Warren, Matthew James
Do they really want to do this? If they do not trust that the file is being backed up correctly by TSM, will they trust the fact TSM say's it has been, even if it could verify the file? The only way I can think of actually getting a byte by byte verificatiuon that a file has been stored correctly

Re: Verification

2001-08-23 Thread John Naylor
Mathew, My thought is, suggest to the client that they pick a file/files at random. rename the original, restore the backup and get the client to check that it is an exact copy. ** The information in this E-Mail is confidentia

Verification

2001-08-23 Thread Matthew Large
Hi All, I have been asked by a customer if it is possible for TSM to verify and confirm the existence of the copy of the data on the tape/disk, against the actual file. I really think he means for TSM to re-read the file it just wrote and compare it with the file on the client. I have explained t

Re: License problem

2001-08-23 Thread wouter-v
I have the same problem, This is a known problem, there is no fix available and no release date for a fix also. See the ouput of my call with Tivoli : Abstract: TivWeb: License problem . System Type: System Model: Other related devices: . Operating System: AIX 4.3 Product Group: Storage Product