Hi Kelly,
your're right, a multistream restore is one of the items on top of our
wishlist.
Just one thought on collocation:
With collocation you can't mount as many tapes as without, ok. But with
collocation, data from one node is much more compactly written to one
tape. So when you don't use
Dear SanTivoli (short name for Tivoli Santa Claus),
my four year old son has a christmas calendar that features a little
bear that visits all the animals in the forest and asks them for their
wishes for christmas. So Mischa (that's the name of the teddy) comes to
find out that the elephant
Hi Brian, hi all *SM'ers
First of all, thanks a lot for anybody that helped me during last
months, solving problems that sometimes went awful. I'm temporarily
leaving the list for holidays, and wanted to wish everybody a merry
Xmas, and happy new year !
See you later, cheers !
Arnaud.
Hi
I run a full backup of a Netware 5 with Tivoli client 4.2.0 here the
statistics:
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects inspected: 33,310
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects backed up: 33,104
12/18/2001 13:58:12 Total number of objects updated: 0
12/18/2001
Heres a select that gives the same info as show volumeusage
select distinct volume_name,node_name from -
volumeusage where node_name = upper('$1') -
and stgpool_name = upper('$2')
MC Matt Cooper (2838) [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/18/2001 08:58:25 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor
Hi
Did anybody know how to calculate with a select command the sum of all my Q
OCC ??
Thanks Robert Ouzen
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Immediate reaction is that your client box is underpowered.
Robert Ouzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/20/2001 10:45:16 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Please Explain
Hi
I run a full backup of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
This e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented
are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those
Hello Everybody,
Does anyone out there run the a similar configuration that may be able to
help us with a few performance options?
TSM Server 4.1.3 running on NT4 Enterprise Edition SP6a
ABC Backup Client 3.1.0.1 running on OPEN VMS 7.2-2
Basically we backed up a 3.5gb file to disk which only
Where is SEARCHMPQUEUE documented ?
Karel Bos [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/19/2001 03:48:25 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: Incremental forever -- any problems? (Scary thoughts)
Put
Well, right off I'd say
q auditocc
now besides that use
select sum (num_files), sum (physical_mb), sum (logical_mb), node_name from
adsm.occupancy group by node_name
Dwight
Unnamed[1]: 46132
Unnamed[2]: 1554.47
Unnamed[3]: 1523.37
NODE_NAME: node1
Unnamed[1]: 10992
Unnamed[2]: 1317.63
I don't see how aggregate rate could exceed network rate. Aggregate is
Bytes Transferred divided by Elapsed Time, and Network is Bytes Transferred
divided by Data Transfer Time what were those values in the session
where Aggregate was greater than Network? How could Data Transfer Time be
Not supported. Worked on 3.1.0.7 and 3.1.0.8 ADSM client code. Can also
backup to 4.1.4 server.
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From: Rosa Leung/Toronto/IBM [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
In the Tivoli Administrators guide.
Where is SEARCHMPQUEUE documented ?
Karel Bos [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/19/2001 03:48:25 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: Incremental forever --
The network transfer rate is the time is takes to send the file to be backed up to the
TSM server.
The aggregate is the total KB backed up / the total time.
The difference is the processing time. The time to contact the TSM server and check if
the file needs to be backed up.
Interestingly
http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/services/datenhaltung/adsm/link/tsm-v42-books/ref
erence/anrar402.htm#HDRSEARCHMPQ
http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/services/datenhaltung/adsm/link/tsm-v42-books/re
ference/anrar402.htm#HDRSEARCHMPQ
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
With my systems and I think most, the Network transfer time will be (much)
faster than the Aggregate time.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/20/01 08:44AM
The network transfer rate is the time is takes to send the file to be backed up to the
TSM server.
The aggregate is the total KB backed
Oops
- Forwarded by Robin Sharpe/WA/USR/SHG on 12/20/01 10:01 AM -
Robin Sharpe
12/20/01 09:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AM cc:
Subject:
Re:
Hi *,
Can anyone share with me, a good rule-of-thumb for the maximum number of LTO
drives that should be attached to a single Ultra-II SCSI bus? Using the
theoretical max transfer rates of 15 MB/s for the drives and 80 MB/s for the
SCSI, I shoould be able to put 5 drives on one bus and still
I don't use (software) compression, hardware yes.
Miles
--
Miles Purdy
System Manager
Farm Income Programs Directorate
Winnipeg, MB, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (204) 984-1602 fax: (204) 983-7557
If you
RMAN has this facility. It's a bit too involved to describe here. If you
have the RMAN 8i Release 2 (8.1.6) User's Guide Reference, chapter 7
covers it.
Joseph T.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Sharp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:14 PM
To: [EMAIL
Hi
The maximum would be 2 drives. But I'd suggest only one drive per bus.
best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Bergkällavägen 31D
192 79 SOLLENTUNA
Växel: 08 - 754 98 00
Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51
Going through the readme for the 4.2 client, I found the new option
INCLUDE.SYSTEMOBJECT ALL mgmtclass
to assign the systemobject to a management class. Also reading the Redbook
Deploying TSM in a Win2k Environment which states that only 1 copy of the
systemobject is kept by TSM. So, assigning
I don't think it is a bug. I think is because my network (SP Switch) capacity greatly
exceeds the clients ability to send data (even though is an S80). If in effect I'm
running 2,3,4,5 backups concurrently.
12/19/01 14:25:28 ANE4952I (Session: 14442, Node: UNXP) Total number of
Hi
S/390 databases cannot be exported to a solaris machine.
Also, if your using Tivoli Storage Manager S/390 Edition version 4.1,
server-to-server isn't supported by Tivoli, and I don't know if it works at
all.
According to Tivoli, exporting a database is only supported on open systems
Well, I can fill you in on 3590 drives and that might be close to LTO's
for each drive on the chain, add half of the previous drives thruput
with 3590-B1A's a single drive on a scsi card all by itself is rated at 9
MB/sec
add another one on the chain, you will gain another 4.5 MB/sec (9/2) or
Ok, this is to everyone still having trouble with the backupset
delete/expire problems.
This is information form Tivoli tech support, so don't shoot the messenger.
It is true that this was a bug in TSM 4.1.2, it seems that if you created a
backupset and it passed its expiration date, the volume
Don't forget to factor in drive compression. I have seen 4 to 1, which
requires 60 MB/sec bandwidth to keep the LTO drive streaming. (If an LTO
doesn't stream, figure 1.5 to 6 MB/sec before compression, depending on
file size)
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc.
121 Cheshire Lane
The Redbook referenced is based on the 4.1.2 client. With this client you
could not restore inactive copies of the system object. The 4.2 client does
allow you to restore inactive copies of the system object (WoooHooo!). You
can also assign a mgmtclass to specify different retentions for the
Strange.
Your query worked for me (with a different nodename), although I had to add
the date to restrict the output to the last 7 hours:
tsm: SSDADSMselect date_time, message from actlog where nodename='PRATHW1'
and
time(actlog.date_time) = current_time - 7 hours and date(actlog.date_time)=
I am having the same problem of restoring from a backupset with a tape drive
attached to a client. I was told by support that GUI won't support using a
local tape drive to restore from a backupset. Command line should work. But
not for me. These are what I have tried:
1) restore backupset
Paul,
I've forwarded this along to the developer to get his ideas. It would
appear that there is some network issue causing this. The backup time looks
good, obviously. When we start to troubleshoot something like this we'll
try a bi-directional ftp of a file. There might be some strange
Actual observed transfer rate here is 15 MB/sec per drive, two drives on the
same card. These are feature code 6205 dual SCSI-II cards in an IBM S7A,
with just one port in use. I feel I'm being limited by the SCSI cards,
because this application is showing a 3:1 compression ratio on tape and
As can be seen, the notion of multiple restore is complicated. I'm sure
that the Tivoli engineers are working hard on implementation ideas. I hope
that they have lots of people that have seen various environments and know
what we see out here. Hint, hint, hint. Let's make sure we get a bunch
Does TSM backup the system object EXACTLY the way NTbackup does?? MS does
provide documentation on DR to hardware other than the original on W2K using
NTbackup. This would be beneficial in a true DR situation.
I have just begun my testing of this...
-Original Message-
From: Rushforth,
GREAT!!.. THANKS FOR THE POST!
Finally got rid of those suckers!
Joe Cascanette
The Cumis Group Limited
-Original Message-
From: Mark Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SOLUTION TO BACKUPSET DELETE/EXPIRE
I will be out of the office from 12/20/2001 until 01/02/2002.
If this is an emergency and you need immediate help, please page the ASP
Day OnCall pager - 1-877-850-5778
---
This message and any included attachments
I have no problem using the Gui for full backupset restores. Is
windows2000 picking up the drive as tape1? Remote Storage in win2000
always starts with Tape0.
As for the command prompts below you only need the backupset name if you
are attached to the TSM Server and doing the restore. #4 is the
Hi TSMers,
Can someone help me with with the following. I am trying to select from the
actlog all entries for a client in the past 7 hours and send them to the user
in a daily report. I may not be doing the sql select right. Nothing is
selected even though the client just did a backup.
= cat
Does anyone have a query that will tell me the average time a backup took
and the average amount of data transmitted?
Can anyone point me to an online reference of element addressing for the
3583?
TIA
David Taylor
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
David Taylor
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/devices/atab104.htm
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Independent IT Consultant
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (408)(831) 332-4006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Take a look at the export node command.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Independent IT Consultant
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (408)(831) 332-4006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Paul, Kelly -
If the FTP times are similar, then another possible cause of this is that
the output disk has file highwater marking turned on (this is the default).
Or, the output disk is very fragmented and nearly full. For a restore of
such a large file, either of these issues can be a
Here ya go:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/devices/atab104.htm
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3582 element reference
Can anyone point me to an online reference of
Ahhh, that rings a bell... there is just one report that covers several
sessions. But I still say its a bug. Whatever you call it, it is
inaccurate and misleading.
Robin Sharpe
Berlex Labs
Miles Purdy
PURDYM@FIPD.
GC.CATo:
Is there any information out there about bare metal restores for Windows
2000 Server?
I have read it is similar to the baremetal for NT4, however what I am
looking for how find out that registry keys I need to adjust if
restoring on to a box that is has hardware that is not the same. With
NT4 I
You know I had a problem similar to this. We were doing a large restore of
a system disk about 50,000 files 1.6Gb. It took about 20 minutes to build
the file list. When it started restoring it restored 1Gb fast and then the
session hung for 45minutes. So I killed the session from TSM and it
MS has an article on How to move a Windows 2000 installation to Different
Hardware, but it uses NTbackup to move the System Objects.
I am in the process of testing this procedure using TSM on different
hardware.
There is a redpiece on W2K restores (SG24-6141-00) that is pretty good that
is for
Setting up a new Citrix farm running W2k SP2 Citrix XPe v1.0 SP1. Looking
to out what client works best. I'm running TSM 4.1.3 on AIX
Thanks,
Bruce Kamp
This will give you average backup stats for the last 14 days.
SELECT entity as node, avg(end_time-start_time) as elapsed_time,
avg(cast((bytes/1024/1024) as decimal(18,0))) as MB from summary
WHERE activity='BACKUP' and examined0 and DAYS(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)
-DAYS(start_time) 15
GROUP BY entity
This is documented in the 3584 UltraScalable Tape Library Planning and
Operator Guide, table 28.
Drives with No Compression:
LTO Ultrium Ultra2 SCSI4
LTO Ultrium Ultra SCSI 2
Drives with 2:1 Compression:
LTO Ultrium Ultra2 SCSI2
LTO Ultrium Ultra SCSI 1
Try this
It gives the averages by node for all successful backups in the summary table
select entity, avg(bytes) Avg Bytes, avg(end_time - start_time) Elapsed \
from summary \
where activity='BACKUP' \
and failed=0 \
group by entity
ENTITY Avg Bytes
Same problem here. Our hot site has different hardware as well. Thank
you for the information.
Happy Holidays.
Joe Cascanette
The Cumis Group Limited
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL
Can somebody refer me to or send to me a copy of the ADSM Exploitation,
Tivoli Storage Manager Migration paper from the 2001 Vienna conference?
It was given by Ken Waite and Andy Damen. Thanks.
_
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
I will be out of the office starting December 20, 2001 and will not return
until January 2, 2002.
I will respond to your message when I return.
I will be out of the office starting December 21, 2001 and will not return
until December 31, 2001.
I am away from the office on leave, returning Monday Dec 31. Pls refer
urgent matters to Tim Starr.
I will be out of the office starting December 21, 2001 and will not return
until December 24, 2001.
I will be out of the office from 21/12/2001 until 31/12/2001.
In my absence anyTSM queries should be addressed to ADSM_ADMIN.
--
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the
60 matches
Mail list logo
