I agree with that this is fixed in 4.1.4. Still you need to be careful
whats causing the problem.
I too have experienced the same problem and ended-up in rebuilding TSM
again. Have you seen actlog message that report ANRE or ANRW before
and after crash. try capture and send it , hopefully
This does not necessarily look wrong to me. I have 3584 library and
old 3575 library. Tape fills to 100% , then expiration expires some files
and pct util drops. You say this has just started to happen, how long
had you been operating "normally"?
What reclamation pct do you use? When you upda
All,
I am experiencing a problem when queering the volume, please see below: Using TSM ver
4 release 2 level 1.7 on NT4 SP6
Volume Name Storage Device EstimatedPct Volume
Pool NameClass Name Capacity Util Status
Clive
I user the following as a script from the command line!
easier to see what is where
#!/bin/ksh
ADSM='dsmadmc -id=X -pa=X'
$ADSM 'SELECT left(V.volume_name,7) as TAPE,
left(V.stgpool_name,4) as STG,
left(varchar(V.pct_utilized),4) as USED,
I don't know why it is designed as it is. Perhaps the overhead in a more
granular resolution would affect performance (imagine if several apps were
repeatedly hammering away at the same file over an extended period of
time). But that is just a guess.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Grou
Here's the clist I execute
PROC 0
PROFILE PROMPT PRE(&SYSUID)
CONTROL NOLIST NOCONLIST MSG FLUSH PROMPT
/* IT IS IMPORTANT TO INCLUDE THE PARAMETER "PROMPT" */
/* IN THE PROFILE AND CONTROL STATEMENTS TO ALLOW*/
/* DSMADMC (TSO ADMIN CLIENT MODULE) TO PROMPT FOR */
/* INPUT (E.G. PASSWO
If you are using a gui or command line...archive...and go back to the gui or
command line...you
will HOLD that mount.
In our dsmserv.opt we now have:
IDLETIMEOUT 15
so when a user does not get all the way out of tsm after an archive,
retrieve, or whatever
we will terminate the session (idletim
Zoinks. What kind of stupid filesystem is that? Back to testing. Thanks
for the info, Andy.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows NTFS last accessed date set by TSM cl
We have been seeing a recurrent problem with GUI restores under Windows NT.
A system administrator will start a restore and walk away from his disk.
When the restore finishes, the session will stay open and the last tape
used in the restore will remain mounted. We have sometimes had a tape drive
t
Hi Alex,
I believe that on NTFS, last access time has a resolution of 1 hour. Thus
if the file was accessed within the last hour, accessing it again won't
change the last access time. If the file was accessed over an hour ago,
then accessing the file will change the last access time. So in some
c
The last access date/time of an NTFS file is only updated if the file is
backed up, it isn't updated
during incremental backup scan processing.
Most virus protection software modifies the last access while scanning the
file system for viruses but
resets it to the original value unconditionally.
Andy,
What exactly is the issue? Personally, during my testing, it looked like
the TSM client maintained the last access date and NTFS didn't automatically
update the Last Access date as you describe when TSM accessed the file (on
WinNT4 SP6, I think). The updated access time issues I encounter
I have tried everyone's suggestions. I believe the fact that I have one AS
statement in the script that it will ignore the attempts of fixing the
output into a 1 line per node output. The -COMMAdelimited , -TABdelimited,
-OUT didn't work. I was able to get a 1 line output, with a title line
Andy,
Recently we are seeing that quite a few tapes are going in to the error state and having damaged files. (Even before I can complete the stgpool backup.) Now these files need to be regenerated. Now, If I had a lookup table I could create a list of the damaged files thru one command instead of
In addition to the accounting log and actlog, you can also check the summary
table for recent entries (in 3.7 and later, I believe).
>select entity, start_time, end_time-start_time as elapsed_time from summary
where
>select colname, remarks from syscat.columns where tabname='SUMMARY'
COLNA
q act search=ANE4964I begint=-24
You can also do a select against the actlog table and extract fields from
the text.
-Original Message-
From: Zosimo Noriega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Elapsed processing time.
Hi All
There is a way to do a select match the volhistory table against your
libvolumes and figure out which ones are missing.
-Original Message-
From: Joel Fuhrman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tapes Blank Under Last Use
In
Hello,
i've this environment server tivoli win2k 4.2.1.0, tsm client 4.2.1.0 on server AIX
4.3.3.0 with storageagent 4.2.1.0 and 2109 switch with 3584 lto IBM library in FC.
During lanfree backup i've this error message:
ANS1301E Serv
Every time I have seen something like this it is a corrupt file in the file
system. Run CHKDSK.
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Here's a new one - 4.2.0 client on WinNT SP 6..
Anybody
NFS
At 09:29 AM 3/27/02 -0600, you wrote:
>What type of filesystem are you automounting? ( NFS, CDs? )
>
>-ed
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002/03/26 05:41:37 PM >>>
>...excuse me, I forgot to mention the TSM client level is 4.2.1 and
>Server
>AIX 4.3 TSM 4.1.4.0.
>
>Thanks.
Have you opened a problem record with Tivoli?
-Original Message-
From: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: win2k tsm client 4.2.1.30 bug
Hi,
The tsm client for windows 2000 "4.2.1.30" is crashing when i
tr
Did this say the input volume was UNAVAILBLE? If so, it is probably the
primary tape volume that has gotten marked that way during a dismount error.
There are a number of fixes for this that have been released. All you have
to do is do an update command against that primary tape and change its
a
I am not sure what you mean by "drive shortcut". How do you create this?
I am not aware of this problem. Can you please provide a step-by-step
recreate scenario, i.e. how to create the drive shortcut, and how to
reproduce the problem? In addtion, please provide a drwtsn32.log file
showing the
The message says "highest return code". So if you get one higher than 11 it
will show as well. Actually you can get a -50 which is higher. This is a
session died. The return code returned to a script is 255 for this instance
(at least on windows).
-Original Message-
From: Michael Benj
I discussed this further at Share with the Product Manager. There is still
not a market there for this functionality in the SUN/ESS combination. In
fact, there is little market for the SUN/EMC and AIX/ESS combinations. That
is why they have not pursued. Veritas only has EMC Timefinder support
Try the
-commadelimited
parameter. This gives a single line of output per row in the table. It's in
standard comma-delimited format, which is understood by most PC
spreadsheets, although not easily by humans. I'm not sure about SAS.
Regards
Richard Foster
I think u need to set the format in SQL for o/p.
That will solve ur problem.
U need to write sql script and then call it from the connect string on shell
script.
Balanand
-Original Message-
From: MC Matt Cooper (2838) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:01 AM
To:
That will help, but you can also do the AS "[ lots of spaces ]" to lengthen
the output field. What we really need is a set displaymode=fixedraw.
This is an example of something that I do:
select stgpool_name as "Storage Pool Name ",
cast(sum(est_capacity_MB*pct_utilized/100/1024) as dec
I have fairly new TSM server 4.2.1.9 on AIX 4.3.3. with 3584 library.
I just did first ARCHIVE from a client. Doing a q mount now shows:
ANR8376I Mount point reserved in device class LTO, status: RESERVED.
at end of display. Archive is finished over an hour now and this message
still shows up
Hello Matt,
remove the -TAB and use -DISPLAY=LIST instead.
I believe this is what you are looking for.
-
Rejean Larivee
IBM TSM/ADSM Level 2 Support
"MC Matt Cooper
(2838)"
FYI
At 05:04 PM 3/27/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi Bruce 1
>
>here is an extract from "ADSM/TSM Quick Facts" by Richard Sims
>(http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir)
>
>
>Segmentation violation ("Segfault")
>
>Also known as Signal 11 (SIGSEGV).
>Program failure in Unix caused a
>programming error
What type of filesystem are you automounting? ( NFS, CDs? )
-ed
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002/03/26 05:41:37 PM >>>
...excuse me, I forgot to mention the TSM client level is 4.2.1 and
Server
AIX 4.3 TSM 4.1.4.0.
Thanks.
Hi,
The tsm client for windows 2000 "4.2.1.30" is crashing when i
try to backup a folder or volume that has "drive shortcuts" example>> D:
Are you having the same problem? Is there a cure for it?
Regards,
Burak
Hi Bruce!
This could be APAR IC30942/PQ48666. This one is fixed in 4.1.4.0 and higher.
4.1.4.5 is the highest 4.1 level available for download.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27
Hi Bruce 1
here is an extract from "ADSM/TSM Quick Facts" by Richard Sims
(http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir)
Segmentation violation ("Segfault")
Also known as Signal 11 (SIGSEGV).
Program failure in Unix caused a
programming error: the program attempts
to write to a region of memory to
If a customer wants to buy AIX box or ESS most of the times he/she will
prefer to get the other instead of going into multi-vendor implementation.
If Sun allow customers to get ESS attached to their boxes too often they
may also loose box sales.
For this reasons AIX/ESS and Sun/EMC are usually bun
Eric,
> My TSM server (4.2.1.8 on AIX 4.3.3 ml8)crashed after running stable for a
> month. It just stopped with no info in the actlog. I just see a core and
> this error in the dsmserv.err:
> I know there is a higher server level available, but I cannot find any
> indication that my crash is
Bruce,
> I'm running TSM 4.1.3.2 on AIX 4.3.3 ML8.
> Last night TSM crashed with this error in the dsmserv.err:
> Any ideas what this means & why it happened?
We had the same problems with 4.1.3.X, server crashed nearly every day,
sometimes every 4 hours, and went immediatly to 4.2.1.X.
E.J.
I assume that it is back up and running now, but check in the actlog
to see what process were running right before the crash (expiration,
reclamation,
migration, etc...). Also, check the size of your recovery log & db to make
sure
they are NOT reaching the MAXIMUM % UTIL!
Regards,
Demetriu
Ike,
I am running the following batch job. I added the -TAB and tried
-OUTFILE with a redirect in the macro to the data set and that didn't work
either. So I tried a few different variation of the above and even went
back to adding a / after the ADSMC as the book says. None of it made
Add me to the list.
However, I heard that it is target to be included in the TSM 5.x
announcement, coming up soon !
Zoltan Forray
Virginia Commonwealth University - University Computing Center
e
IC29368 was fixed in both 4.1.3 and 4.2.0. 4.2.0.
If you scroll to to the top of the "APARs fixed" section in the 4.2.1.15
(and 4.2.1.28) README files, you'll see that it says something like,
"APARs resolved in 4.2.0". Apparently the README file for the 4.2.1.x
patches got mixed up (at least in p
Thanks for your help
Joni Moyer
Associate Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(717)975-8338
"Loon, E.J.
van - SPLXM" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup failure msg=ans4028e
S
The first thing I usually look at is what was going on in TSM just before
the TSM server crashed
"Bruce Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/27/2002 08:40:47 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi *SM-ers!
My TSM server (4.2.1.8 on AIX 4.3.3 ml8)crashed after running stable for a
month. It just stopped with no info in the actlog. I just see a core and
this error in the dsmserv.err:
ANR7834S Thread 49 (tid 3151) terminating on signal 11 (Segmentation
violation).
ANR7834S GPR 0: 0x00
I'm running TSM 4.1.3.2 on AIX 4.3.3 ML8.
Last night TSM crashed with this error in the dsmserv.err:
03/26/2002 20:07:07 ANR7838S Server operation terminated.
03/26/2002 20:07:08 ANR7837S Internal error TMTXN008 detected.
03/26/2002 20:07:08 ANR7834S Thread 88 (tid 5800) terminating on signal
Hello all,
I am trying to write a simple script that shows the nodes that were
not accessed by TSM for more than x days and then do an E-mail notification
from there. I AM RUNNING TSM 4.1.5 on z/OS 1.1. The select command to get
the node name, last access date, and contact name (the e-ma
Matt,
What do you do to execute the select command in the z/OS environment?
-Original Message-
From: MC Matt Cooper (2838) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NEED HELP CONTROLLING SCRIPT OUTPUT, FIELD LENGTHS
Hello all,
Has anyone seen any problems on the 3583 using the SDG module. I connect
fine using the TSM drivers but when I try to label a tape it loads and then
times out after a minute or 2. Are there any special parms that anyone is
aware of. I have had no problems with the SCSI attached 3583.
Hi TSM'ers
Our Company needs the TDP Module for Oracle on (SuSE-) Linux urgently.
All that I#ve heard from Tivoli is, that the product "is part of the
planned 2.2.2 release which is currently targeted for 1Q03."
Please can everybody reply to this mail who has the same needs. Iwould
like to c
Hi Joni!
If I remember correctly I have seen this error when the permissions on the
root of the F: drive are gone. Check whether the SYSTEM account (or whatever
other account you use for TSM) has read permission on F:\. I've had a drive
with the permissions removed from just the root of the drive,
sorry
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the syst
Do an search:
q act search=ANE4964I begind=today-1 endd=today
Oliver
Zosimo Noriega
Kopie:
Gesendet von:Thema: Elapsed processing time.
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Hi
All you have to think about is the ports that has to be open.
The ports used for TSM are 1500 for the server, 1501 for the client. These
ports can be changed using the opt/sys file on your client/server.
This would mean
Allow from secure to non-secure 1501
Allow from non-secure to secure 1
Hi All,
We use Informix 7.31UC7, TDP for Informix 4.1.3 and TSM Server 4.1
When we do a cold full resore (onbar -r -f dbslist) everything goes fine and
after an onmode -m we restored the complete database.
But when we do a cold point-in-time restore (onbar -r -n 20 -f dbsfile) the
restore fails
Hi Niklas
A prerequisite to using immediate actions schedules are that you're using
prompted mode on the scheduler, as the server has to contact the client.
Immediate action schedules won't work with polling mode on the client.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Hi
ANR2579E is not a TDP SQL error, is a TSM server error and means:
Schedule schedule name in domain domain name for node node name failed
(return code return code).
Explanation: This message is displayed when a client reports failure in
executing a scheduled action. The
return code reported
"Pending" state means that the schedule will start soon. This state is
entered when schedule time is passed but the schedule will start with
random delay within startup window.
If you want to change this behavior look for SET RANDOMIZE command.
For example if the server is with default randomiza
58 matches
Mail list logo