Mobeen Mahamood C.M
Gerald,
device file /dev/rmt/0mt is for drive, not for library. You should have in
your /dev/rmt directory something like xlb, where x is number which depend
on the order, in which you run add_drv commands for drives and library. It
does not matter what this number is, but you have to have this fi
Hello Ignacio,
I had performance problems with TSM too. (I still have
in another installation too :p) ... After fixing the
networks problems (to 100/full duplex) performance
was still poor.
I don't know what version you are using but in my case
I had to change the TCPWINDOWSIZE in the client
opt
What version os TSM are you using? We are using 5.1.0.2.
We are also using a SAN Data Gateway within the IBM
3583-L72.
I'm trying to determine why the firmware upgrade went wrong
in our case?
Thanks in advance.
On Mon, 13 May 2002 16:07:45 +0200
Burak Demircan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I u
I believe all that is necessary when upgrading slots on a library
is to halt and restart TSM server and it picks up new config.
I have done this when upgrading am IBM 3575 library.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/15/02 05:34PM >>>
You have to re-create the library
- checkout libvols remove=
Lindsey:
I've been walking around once and again about networking configuration,
then with disk i/o performance, then with how is configurated on disk
the storage pool (if it was in raid 5, or in raid 1 or in raid 10...).
Those servers are connected through gigabit ethernet channels, and they
are
Try using sudo.
You can allow your non-root user execute only the dsmc command as root.
=
"Do or Do Not, there is no try"
-Yoda. The Empire Strikes Back
___
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger
Comunicacisn instantanea gratis con tu gent
On linux when starting the dsmc sched process you need to be root. Otherwise
it says "ANS1817E Schedule function can only be run by a TSM authorized
user."
I'm trying to write a script that gets run by a non-root user to start the
scheduler. Is it possible to get around this limitation somehow? I
There isn't any reason to reboot the clients.. At worst all you need to do
is stop/start the dsmc schedule process. How you go about that is dependent
on the operating system. On NT/2000 it's a service you just click stop and
start. On Unix you kill the dsmc sched process and restart it. Regardles
Thanks for giving me a good insight. I'm attaching the actlog from
00:00.(I'm sorry if it's too long). We have client polling every 12
hours. It looks like the client started and couldn't connect with the
server and ended inmmediately.
Today I did a test on one of client node. I rebooted the clien
I would recommend doing basic troubleshooting.. check the TSM server
activity log around the time the backup window occurred (e.g. -> q act
startt=01:00). What was the TSM server doing if not backing anyone up? Was
it trying to contact the clients and failing to (there would be repeated
"contactin
Hi,
Be sure to set "ALL" parameters for the nic cards correctly to match the
ports on the switches.
Ensure that "ALL" 'no options' are set correctly for your environment.
Example:
AIX 433_ML_08:
100MB ethernet nic cards have the xmit/recieve buffer pools maxed out
100MB ethernet nic cards
Hi:
I'm managing a pretty small TSM installation with 4 RS/6K machines (2
6M1 and 2 6H1) running AIX 4.3.3 (ML9).
TSM software consists of the server (running in a 6M1 - 7Gb RAM), and
the clients running in the same machine and on the others.
I´ve got the following situation:
- the total of data
Hi, Krastev,
I'm sorry that I'm sending this urgent mail. I don't have nobody to
ask. I have TSM server on AIX. I had to reboot TSM and AIX due to time
zone change. Then I noticed all the client schedules missed. I tested
restarting baclient on one of client node and its event worked, but not
othe
TSM server had MST and I changed to EST, CUT -5, but the result was
wrong one. So, I went to SMIT on AIX and changed time only without
rebooting again. It looked fine and TSM was getting the right time.
You're probably right on that, but I don't know how to calculate the
difference in time. Do bac
I have had a strange problem that has been following two our our Solaris
boxes. They are both running 5.8 and I had one of the boxes upgrade to
TSM 4.2.2. We fire up the scheduler, and it runs normally, once, then it
stops responding. Netstat shows that the scheduler is listening on 1501, but
t
You have to re-create the library
- checkout libvols remove=no
- delete library
- create library
- checkin libv
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
c
You cannot mark primary stgpool volume as offsite. As per the
help/Reference Guide:
"3. This value is valid only for volumes in copy storage pools."
You cannot overcome the TSM design. Still can use MOVe MEDia
OVFLOcation='Your off-site vault'.
However think twice is this what you want good enough
Are you able using "dd if=/dev/zero" to create file of this size. If you
can problem is in TSM. But until then you cannot be sure there is
something in HP-UX settings.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor
Jeff,
Problem1:
undocumented usually means not supported. Same as you cannot complain for
change of undocumented API in Windows kernel by a service pack. And if
SHOW VERSION does not display unicode-enabled flag this does not
automatically mean it is not set.
Problem2:
Try to add NAMEType=UNIcode
Hi, all,
Last night I had to reboot the AIX on which TSM was running because I
changed time zone on AIX.
I made sure of no session and no process running and disabled sessions
and 'halted' TSM. and shutdown and reboot AIX box. TSM came up
automatically. I enabled sessions and accepted date. Well
Did the resulting change in time on the TSM server mean that the schedules
were now past their startup window?
Eg.
01:00 change time to 04:00
Client schedule is set to start at 02:00 - has 1 hour startup window
In this case, the schedules would be misssed because TSM server was down
(sort of) be
We recently ran into an odd problem restoring files to an HP-UX 11.0
system with 4.1.2.0 client software. The TSM server is at 4.2.1.9 and
runs under OS/390. We received the following error messages:
05/05/02 11:57:26 ANS4025E Error processing '/db/tjfrev6/MUMPS.EXT':
file exceeds user or syste
I don't know, but I've seen a similar situation when auditing a volume where
all the files were bad without setting quiet=yes. It got flooded and
stopped recording. I halted and restarted the server. I have since started
using the dsmulog utility to reduce this exposure.
Alex Paschal
Storage A
The Redbook was written with 4.1.2 client as a reference so there may be a
few changes on your version:
To change the options mentioned, do so before you click the restore tab.
Later versions of the client no longer prompt (11b) when restoring the
system object.
I've noticed the system file pro
Our Dells have been coming in with 2 partitions, I think WinNT is installed
in partition 2.
TSM can't deal with the partition information; if it isn't stored in the
registry or in a file, TSM doesn't see it.
Which is why you must recreate any partitioning yourself, before you do the
restores.
On
This is from a co-worker doing some DR testing, in this case, restoring a
W2K box, essentially doing BMR
**
I am trying to recreate the restore procedures in the IBM redbook
"Deploying Tivo
When I archive a file space to ARCHIVEPOOL (a primary storage pool) I
can't change the status of the volume to OFFSITE. Is there a way to
archive files spaces to tape and sent them out without keeping a copy on a
primary storage pool?
In other words I would like my archives to be sent directly t
Yes, I am having the same problem with the AIX client with a 4.1.3 server. I
am getting it even on short (11 character) names. It is a known "internal
defect" that was fixed in the 5.1 clients. If the 5.1 client for linux is
out you might try that.
I tried the 5.1 AIX client earlier, and ran into
error message manual states this is a restore/retrieve error, not a
backup/archive error...
and from the error manual text it sounds like a Netware client limitation in
that the ID you are operating under isn't allowed to allocate a file that
large (4 GB)
I believe it was in TSM 3.7.2 when it was
Hamish Marson wrote:
> Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Marson!
>>You will have to use the 5.1 client. EXT3 is not supported by the 4.2
>
> or 4.1
>
>>client.
>>
>
>
> Ah. Many thanks... I was believing the statement that it wouldn't stop
> you tryng to backup other filesystem types in the d
We are getting an error "ANE4025E (filename) file exceeds user or
system file limit" trying to back up a 4 GB file on a Netware client.
My questions are:
1. Is this a TSM restriction or a Netware restriction?
2. Where are these restrictions documented (I can't seem to find it).
Thanks,
I have been seeing many of these messages when backing up a Linux RH 7.2
client to our AIX 4.2.2 server:
ANE4018E (Session: 1254, Node: .x..xxx) Error
processing '/home/gale/CommuniGate/Accounts/ahous.macnt/-
INBOX.mdir/10005-S___-20020
Hi all!
I use SQL in my scripts to determine whether backup finished or not and it
worked OK until few days ago the following message appeared:
ANR2963W This SQL query may produce a very large result table, or may
require a significant amount of time to compute.
Do you wish to proceed? (Yes/No)
Check to see if the activity log contains any error messages. I
have seen these errors before when TSM is trying to mount a volume for the
DB2 backup that has been marked read-only. Also, what is your DB2 fixpack
level? Your TSM level?
At 04:43 PM 5/15/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>*SMers,
>
>
I had this problem, but it was fixed by making sure that the box
titled "does affect resource group" was NOT checked when the generic
resource group was defined. Was this done?
At 10:49 AM 5/15/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Dave,
>
>Thanks for your help yesterday. Greatly appreciated. All
Good morning,
TSM 4.1.4 running on AIX 4.3.3
I recently upgrade my StorageTek L700 tape library
slot capacity from 216 to 384. When I tried to add
tapes beyond the old storage space, I was getting
ANR8314E Library is full message. Does any one know
how to make TSM to recognize and use the new
*SMers,
Our DBAs are having a few problems backing up a DB2 database to a TSM 3590
tape pool via LANfree. There are no errors in the dsmerror.log on the
client, nor any indicated errors in the server actlog, nor any errors in the
NT Event Viewer that could be related.
The storage agent is running
Hello there,
We stumbled onto the following problem, the hard way i may add.
We have a mixed environment using AIX, Windows NT/2K and Sun Solaris.
The Sun and NT boxes all run a very recent TSM client level.
Some AIX boxes are running TSM client code by now as well, but most of the
aren't on AIX
Hi,
Two problems with unicode.
Problem 1:
Using the undocumented command SHOW VERSION, i can't see any filespaces
that have FILESPACE UNICODE set to YES. When i run Q FILESPACE nodename *,
i can see the unicode filespace. i.e.
Node NameFilespace FSID Platform
File
Can anyone tell me why my activity log has stopped recording. Best I can
tell is that it was flooded with
ANR8216W Error sending data on socket 59. Reason 32.
which I believe is from the web interface (which was probably me). This
happened last night and nothing has been recorded in the activi
Dave,
Thanks for your help yesterday. Greatly appreciated. All seemed to have gone well...
didn't test for failover as of yet (SA's had other things to do). One question if you
don't mind...
It seems (according to the SA's) that after installing TSM and setting up all of the
services, the S
On our well-behaved and moderately loaded system, I am not seeing a
problem with anything in v4.2.2.2 (AIX 4.3.3). However, on the more
'abused' systems, ones that are constantly migrating and have users
on them all the time, the expiration hangs whenever there is a
migration, reclamation or move
Yesterday I put comment on this in error, got my "MP" parameters
mixed up. I confused MPTHREADING with SEARCHMPQUEUE.
My apologies!
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/15/02 10:01AM >>>
David,
I am on os390 2.10 running a 4.2 server and changed to mpthreading yes last
year.
Have had no issue
Stuart,
Are you setting TDPO_NUM_BUFFERS to something to other than 1 (default)?
Setting TDPO_NUM_BUFFERS to anything higher causes TDP Oracle to spawn
threads for sending data buffers to the TSM Server. If you have
TDPO_NUM_BUFFERS in your options file, comment it out using '*' and run
again. If
Hi Everybody,
I am very disappointed with 4.2.2 patch levels. I upgraded to 4.2.2.1 and saw
the worst version
I have ever seen. I think we all should stick to 4.2.2.0 for a time or upgrade
5.1.x.x
Regards,
Burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECT
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
>Hi Marson!
>You will have to use the 5.1 client. EXT3 is not supported by the 4.2 or 4.1
>client.
>
Ah. Many thanks... I was believing the statement that it wouldn't stop
you tryng to backup other filesystem types in the docs... How many more
times must I beat myse
Thanks Del,
i feel so stupid, knowing that for a long time. in fact I had modify myself
these options on all the nodes. I hadn't take time to check this ###@@!!
Thank's.
I think it will correct the problem...
By the way. with server in 4.1.. or 4.1.5 and a baclient 4.2.1., you only
need " befo
I didn't know that.
Thank's.
>
___
> Michael REGELIN
> Ingenieur Informatique - O.S.O.
> Groupware & Messagerie
> Centre des Technologies de l'Information (CTI)
> Route des Acacias 82
> CP149 - 1211 Geneve 8
> Tel. +
Michael,
I had the same problem at first but another way to put in the syntax under
the OBJECTS box is:
C:\Progra~1\Tivoli\TSM\domino\domsel.cmd
That way you don't have to worry about either set of quotes.
Just a thought...
Brian Scott
EDS - Enterprise Distributed Capabilities
MS 3278
Troy, M
David,
I am on os390 2.10 running a 4.2 server and changed to mpthreading yes last
year.
Have had no issues.
To get most noticeable benefits you need to be in the scenario where :-
You have a multi processor mainframe
Adsm is currently running its single processor at 100%
The mainframe overall
Hi Marson!
You will have to use the 5.1 client. EXT3 is not supported by the 4.2 or 4.1
client.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Hamish Marson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 15:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LInu
Hi all.
I'm trying to get the tsm client to work on my laptop running standard
Kernel 2.4.17 (Not the mdk kernel), on a Mandrake 8.1 base, with ext3
filesystems, and dsmc just keeps saying either no domain, or invalid
filesystem... e.g.
[root@ballbreaker bin]# df -k
Filesystem 1k-block
> the fact that the domdsm.log contains nothing about the failed operation
> means maybe that it has been rejected before starting using the command
line
> with means in return that it can be a problem between the node and the
> server ??
Mike,
You are correct. If "domdsm.log" and "dsm_month.lo
to verify:
lslpp -l (or -h) tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server
you probably didnt update the "msg"
per the "install" readme
USING: To "install", as root user, follow these steps:
0. Uncompress and untar the file TSMSRVAIX04_02_02.tar.gz
1. Halt your server
2. Start SMIT and select the following optio
Matt,
>From the TDP for SQL log you appended,
the TDP for SQL log backups are working fine.
There is something else failing or wrong in
your script that is causing a non-zero return
code to be sent back to the scheduler.
Better take a closer look at the script.
Thanks,
Del
A "Return code=1" for me means password problem. I usually try to sign
onto the client with Domino Command Line and try to do a "domdsmc q adsm"
command
"Regelin Michael
(CHA)" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the command response correcrty. But with the wrong adsm server.
Let me be clear: I use two schedule with to different adsm node on 2
different adsm server.
the domdsmc q adsm show information of the first adsm server, but not the
second...
thanks
>
_
I have a 3.7.2 TSM server on AIX that has a reclamation process that is
waiting to mount a volume that is access=AVAILABLE
I attempted to cancel the process, but the process remains, with the input
volume mounted, and the wait counter for the mount is at 53,635 seconds.
Is there any way to kill
Hi Del,
thank's for your response.
There is no message in domdsm.log. Only in dsmerr.log (the one configure
whith the schedule).
Here is the opt file:
Commethod tcpip
tcpport 1506
TCPServeraddressADSM3
COMPression off
DOMain ALL-LOCAL
Subdir
> My question point to this:
> To restore exchange I need one fullbackup or one fullbackup and a set of
> incrementals or one differential backup.
> However, I need one fullbackup. How can I or TDP secure that there is
> a correct set of full and incremental backups to restore from an
incremental
Hello,
Did you do this via smitty - upgrade all? - I never believe it!! Maybe I
should! It is easy to unhighlight a package, or miss it all together.
Can you check that you have the correct version of help? Or that the help
was in fact installed? And that it exists in the right place.
Make sure
> ANS1512E Scheduled event 'MONTHLY-DOMINO' failed. Return code=1
>
> Everything seems to be correctly set up. I don't know where to look
now
Mike,
I suggest looking more closely at the scheduler log
as well as the DOMDSM.LOG. The DOMDSM.LOG will have
entries in it that indicate if there w
Yes I agree with Eric,
First AUDIT VOL FIX=NO if all is OK then (I've have had a few problems with
3590E's going unavailable. Then
Next
MOVE DATA across to an empty volume,
If the AUDIT was not good, fix using AUDIT VOLUME FIX=YES, and still MOVE
the data you have across to another tape.
Then s
Good morning/aftrenoon/evening *SMers!
We've got a NT4 box running client 4.2.1.20 and TDP for SQL 2.2. It backs up
to an AIX 4.3.3 server run TSM server 4.2.0.0.
The scheduled logbackups fail every two hours
5-05-2002 09:57:04 Next operation scheduled:
15-05-2002 09:57:04
-
Hi Matthew!
Try capturing the output from the batchfile (fi >c:\temp\output.txt).
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Thomas, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANS1512E Return
I'm having problem to schedule a selective backup with TDP for DOMINO 1.1.2.
On the server NT, I have 3 different schedule:
1 for Backup/Archive
1 for Incremental and weekly selective (ADSM server = ADSM1 / ADSM node =
domino-firm)
1 for monthly selective (ADSM server = ADSN3 / ADSM node = domin
Hi Mike!
I would start an AUDIT VOLUME FIX=NO on the tape. This will tell you which
files are damaged. Let's hope they are TSM backup files, not TDP backup
files!
Afterwards, you can run an AUDIT VOLUME FIX=YES. It will remove the damaged
files from your database, so they will be backed up again d
Hi ,
I'm having a problem after an upgrade of TSM 4222 server, from a prevously version
4210, on AIX 433.
The help on line dosn't work, when i try to use a simple help command, for example
HELP REG LIC,
i receive an output that is on a 1 line whithout carriage return.
Can anybody help me to fi
Hi Paul,
I understand the difference between a full, incremental and differential backup.
My question point to this:
To restore exchange I need one fullbackup or one fullbackup and a set of incrementals
or one differential backup.
However, I need one fullbackup. How can I or TDP secure that the
hi,
I wonder how the blocksize of the mt devices could affect the performance of
the backups. lsattr -El mt0 currently shows a value of 1024.
Did anybody play with this? I did not find anything about it on the web. Any
idea about the maximum settable value?
thanxs
Claudia
71 matches
Mail list logo
