Mark Stapleton wrote:
I have the following statement in my CLOPTSET:
EXCLUDE *:\...\documents and settings\...\usrclass.dat
10/17/2002 20:42:49 ANE4987E (Session: 1853, Node: UCC-PC84) Error
processing '\\ucc-pc84\c$\Documents and
Settings\kperdue.ADM.VCU.EDU\Local
Settings\Application Da
Still no joy with the EXPORT. I am pretty much back to square-1.
Export fails with:
10/17/2002 20:57:44 ANRD AFCPUTIL(1683): ThreadId<3609> Row not
found for bitfile 0.5885060.
Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/16/2002 03:53
Joel, I made a .bat file to start dsmadmc in the mac directory,
then I made a shortcut to execute the .bat file. Here is the file -
cd macs
set dsm_dir=c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient
set dsm_config=c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsm.opt
"c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmadmc.ex
I have a 3575-L32. What color are the "tabs" on the new tapes.
Red, Blue or Green? Are they the same as existing tapes?
If not you may have a higher capacity tape than drive can use.
That's my quick answer. If that's not it then I would suggest
reboot server with TSM and 3575 library and try a
testing
All,
We have TDP for Oracle 2.1.0.10 for our machines, and, with no chance to
upgrade, I need to figure out how the old options are laid out.
Does anyone know where I can find the manual for it? (2.1)
I've looked here:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/td/TD_PROD_LIST.
ht
Hi ADSM'ers
While running space reclamation I receive this messages:
ANR1044I Removable volume SCH015 is required for space reclamation.
ANR0985I Process 38 for space reclamation running in the background complete
with completion state FAILURE at 12:47:38
ANRD afmigr.c (3007): ThreadId<35> Sp
> We have installed TDP for Exchange in one of our Exchange servers and the
> Administrator wants to be able to access the GUI for TDP from his PC to
be
> able to do backups/restores remotely.
> We normally use for the NT side of it the TSM Web Client and we are
looking
> for something similar to t
1. Not 100% sure, but Veritas "dominates the market" because they give it
away, right?
I mean, don't they bundle it with Solaris or some other OS, so when they
count their installed base, they count all the Sun boxes whether people are
using it on those boxes or not?
Hope I'm not just disseminati
Hello,
We have installed TDP for Exchange in one of our Exchange servers and the
Administrator wants to be able to access the GUI for TDP from his PC to be
able to do backups/restores remotely.
We normally use for the NT side of it the TSM Web Client and we are looking
for something similar to th
model - 3575lib
LABEL LIBV 3575LIB LABELS=B CHECKIN=SCR SEARCH=BULK OVERWRITE=YES
This library has been in use for 5 years...maybe longer.
I've never had a problem scratching new volumes before but it just does not
like these tapes.
I'm painfully aware that 3.7 is NOT the NEW TSM. We've had dif
Yes, in prompted mode you have one more port to worry about. Polling mode
uses the port for data transfers while prompting uses separate port. The
reason is the need to drive in prompting mode the client on the TSM server
itself. Thus server is on 1500 (default) and prompted client is on 1501.
Zla
If you look at service, service2, service5, serviceb (index.storsys is
alias) they weren't deleted anything. You can find some rather old but
working pieces there.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Alex Paschal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17.10.2002
We did this twice last month.
- Upgraded original server to 5.1
- Installed new server with TSM 5.1
- Created identical disk layout on new server
- Stopped TSM on original server
- Copied all disk/file pools, DB, and log volumes to the new server
- Started TSM on new server.
ps. to prevent proble
- I assume you make a typo and are talking about ITSM 5.1
- you need to perform both upgrade and box replacement. Depending on order
you have two choices
-- move to new box + upgrade --> backup DB on old server, install
current version (4.2.x.y) on new box, restore DB there, upgrade to 5.1
--
Hi !!
Well this matter has been discussed on numerous occasions on this mailing
list. My first suggestion would be to quickly move on to the TSM 5.1 Ver.
it has a lots of new features incorporated. The following points may be
useful for you to probability convince your management to stay with TSM.
HI,
solaris 8
tsm client 4.x
When i run a manual backup of certain directories on the client it failes.
the message is: ANS1136E Not file owner
directory is owned by a user drwxrwxr-x
files are owned by root group other rw-r-r
I dont get itit should work.
anyone have a clue???
Michelle
hello,
I get when I click on either a filespace or a volume the following message:
Is this a know bug??
I did run the ./dsmserv runfile ../webimages/dsmserv.idl
10/18/02 11:56:15 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: QUERY
PROCESS
10/18/02 11:56:15 ANR0944E QUERY PROCESS: No act
Hi there,
Well, for one, changes in access permissions for files in unix filesystems
will not trigger an incremental backup in netbackup - as such change will
not change the files' modified-date.
Regards,
Carsten Moldrup
Kelvin Tan
Subject
People,
Anybody have any ideas on how we can fix the following. We have Oracle
8.1.7.0 backing up to TSM 3.7.4 using TDP for Oracle 2.1.0.9 under AIX 4.3.3
ML8.
Backup fails with the error message as below after approximately 2hrs and
errpt indicates that Oracle core dumps at this time as well.
Hi Gurus
At the moment we are using TSM 4.2 but the management is looking at Veritas Enterprise
Netbackup and I have to convince them about staying put with TSM. Has anybody move
from TSM to Veritas Enterprise Netbackup 4.5 running on Unix?? Any advantages
Veritas has over TSM? If TSM is t
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>If you run your client schedules in prompted mode (rather than the default
>polling mode), the server initiates the backup, not the client.
Hi Mark
But as far as I understand it, once the scheduler in prompted mode
is initiated by the server to do the
Alex Paschal wrote :
>Let me get this straight. They're willing to do one outside initiated
IP-IP
>rule on the firewall (your server-server communication), they're just not
>willing to multiple IP-IP port limiting rules, one for each client?
>Then what about dropping a second NIC in each client
Hi all,
anyone seen this error, when I am trying to backup an NFS directory on a
client I get this error. Is there a limitation within TSM w.r.t
length of file-names
I am on 4.2.20 client (solaris-2.8) talking to a 4.2.20 server (sol-2.8)
Any info is helpful
thanks
Chetan
ANS4018E Err
24 matches
Mail list logo
