Hi all
I am trying to use the web client through an ssh tunnel. I've configured my port
forwarding to connect to port 1581 on the remote machine. I can see the console with
the
4 options (backup, restore, archive,retrieve) but when I click one of them, I get
error ANS2600S, blah blah connection
Before the APAR, the Search=yes parameter allowed TSM to grab all tapes,
not just those with category FF00. The APAR fixed this misbehavior which
apparently was introduced at 4.2.1. Grabbing ALL the tapes in the
library, regardless of their category, including tapes with other
"libraries" data on
Please explain more, as I don't see how anything would change. Inserted
tapes in a 3494 go to category FF00 which means "who wants to adopt me?"
Are there some additional parms now in TSM to allow the search=yes and
"tapes that begin with xxx" which work for a 3494? I admit I haven't
looked rec
BTDT! I use this AIX script: (modified for your volsers)
cp /dev/null temp.file
for volid in `mtlib -l/dev/lmcp0 -qC -sff00|grep ^AIX|cut -c-6`
do
echo "checkin libv 3494vts $volid status=scratch checklabel=no" >>
temp.file
done
dsmadmc -id=... -pass=... macro temp.file
Tommy Templeton <
This "Volume Stealing" behavior was discovered by a client of mine in
March 2002. the symptoms were that TSM did not restrict itself to the
category codes it is configured for. In TSM, the application, NOT the
library, is responsible to respect the category rules. Upgrade TSM to
4.2.1.13 to get
Hello all,
does anyone know if there is a way to keep the installer from erroring on
tivguid/"some_non_en_us_language"\*.cat files not found ?
I use the msiexec statement for my installs, and I had been deleting all
the extra language directories and files from my install source to save
space. B
Thanks Orville. I did another test today. Here are the results. I think my
problem is the "SEARCH=YES" option. I will be leaving that off now. The
volumes that start with VT don't belong in my library. All of mine start
with AIX.
02/28/03 13:26:19 ANR2017I Administrator TSM issued command: CH
WHen I added capacity to a 3583 library I had to reboot the WIn2k server
itself to get the change recognized in TSM. I tried just restarting TSM, but
I think it was more of a SCSI/driver issue. After the reboot of the Win2k
server, TSM recognized the new slots.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original
The command line option -optfile is the easiest to use. On AIX this means
becoming familiar with the Server Stanza options in the dsm.sys file and
creating multiple stanzas.
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc. (http://www.datatrend.com)
IBM Premier Business Partner
121 Cheshire Lane,
>Is there a way to override the options file on a scripted backup so as to
>backup all data whether or not it is usually? I thought this was considered
>in as Selective but tests prove otherwise.
Explore the DSM_* environment variables, such as DSM_CONFIG .
Richard Sims, BU
We utilize Sun/Solaris as the TSM server, Emulex LP9002 and drivers with an
IP over fibre configuration. Would like to add an additional HBA to
increase throughput. What TSM configuration changes to the DMS.opt should be
considered and are there potential issues might crop up? Is that too
generic,
We are experiencing and interesting problem on our TDP for R3 restores.
We have an old E4000 being used as a development system. We are at Solaris 8
patch 17. TIVsmCapi - 4.2.1 TIVsmCba - 4.2.1 and TDP/R3ora64 - 3.2.0.11. We
back up fine. On restore, things start out good. We use netstat to monitor
Can you be more specific? What exactly is your usual backup scenario, and
what exactly would you like to do differently?
If you're talking about overriding include/exclude statements, see my post
from yesterday on the "Multiple include exclude files" subject. I've also
posted in the past on this;
This may be a manifestation of the following APAR. This was repaired in
4.2.1.13
<@>
IC33056 TSM 4.2.1 3494 CATEGORIES SCRATCH PRIVATE INSERT
When multiple TSM V4.2.1 Servers are using the same
partitioned 3494 Tape Library it is possible for a volume to
get checked into the wrong server. As
Hi Gretchen (and Gerhard),
Hope this finds you doing well. We've sure missed you at SHARE!
Question: Have you done anything new to "protect" yourself from a "bad" maintenance
level? Was there something special in 5.1.5 or 5.1.6 that attracted you to upgrade so
soon?
I have a customer wanting v5,
Hello all,
Is there a way to override the options file on a scripted backup so as to
backup all data whether or not it is usually? I thought this was considered
in as Selective but tests prove otherwise.
Thanks,
Rob Hefty
IS Operations
Lab Safety Supply
(608)757-4998
I believe a simple import should work for ya.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant -ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant
Cell (831) 595-3962
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
Off-hand, I do not know what the problem could be, at least for the
non-4.1.2 nodes. For the 4.1.2 nodes, I would recommend upgrading to the
latest client levels (or at least something that is supported. as 4.1 is
no longer supported).
For the 4.2 or higher clients:
Do the same clients exhibit th
Sorry about the omitted Subject line.
Andy,
There are several nodes that are 4.1.2.x that are having >the issues. But, there are also several Win2k nodes with >client code 4.2.2.0 that are also experiencing this issue
Dameon.
You do not indicate which version of the TSM client you >are running
Hi, all
I'm runnig a TSM 4.2 for LAN servers and another TSM 4.2 for SAN
servers. I heard Tivoli has a good product about disk storage reporting
from LAN and SAN. Anyone using any good reporting and managing software
from Tivoli? My main interest is all disk utilization from LAN and SAN
attached s
Hi Lee
I'll look into that. However, we have a 50GB backupool. Would this not be
affected too?
Thanks
Farren
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Frag
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Farren Minns wrote:
>Hi Richard and thanks for the response.
[...]
>However, the reason for my post was more that I was concerned about the
>number of bytes moved figures (below). The 5000Mb volume is either plainly
>being shown incorrectly, or perhaps something more serious
Hello,
I use TSM server 5.1.5 on SuSE 8.1 (no tapes connected) without problems in an
experimental environment. Now I got a tape charger and want to use it, but
the scsi driver is only for 2.4.18 kernel.
Has anyone out there a driver version for 2.4.19 (do IBM plan to compile it on
that level?)
You do not indicate which version of the TSM client you are running. This
is important, as the elapsed processing time is being reported to the
servr by the client.
There was a problem back in version 4.1.2 where elapsed processing time
was not being reported correctly (it was too short, as you ar
Hi Again
Regarding the TSM DB, wouldn't the 'Used' and 'Total Usable Pages' figures
help to point to a fragmentation problem.
The output fro our DB is as follows:-
Available Space (MB): 10,000
Assigned Capacity (MB): 8,500
Maximum Extension (MB):
Dameon - When posting, please include an email Subject for tracking the thread.
>...Does anyone know of a more accurate place one should find such data?
Have you compared your TSM Accounting Records data with the numbers being seen
in the ANE activity log entries? Traditionally, the Accounting R
Looks like you have hit a 4gb limit. I forget the parm, but if you are using newfs or
mkfs to create database volumes, there is "largefiles" (I think) which allows file
sizes above 4gb.
Using solaris 8 here, and have two db volumes of 6gb each. Works fine.
Hope this helps.
Hi Richard and thanks for the response.
I know I was vague about the performance and we have spent the day doing
all sorts of tests to see what improvements can be made. When we have been
runnings test backups of small file systems, there has been no activity on
the server at all.
However, the r
Hi All TSMers
I'm Running TSM 4.2.2.12 on a Solaris 2.7 server (E250 400Mhz, 1GB mem). We
have been having severe performance issues recently and moved our database
volumes off onto a new disk. To do this we formatted a new db volume and
copy, and then we deleted the original ones. TSM immediately
My TSM server is 4.2.3.0 on AIX 4.3.3
I am seeing inaccurate values for elapsed processing time
for multiple os platforms, multiple os levels, and
multiple tsm client levels.
I have included one example. Has anyone else seen similar
inaccuracies?
If looking to see how long my backup took, I assum
>I'm Running TSM 4.2.2.12 on a Solaris 2.7 server (E250 400Mhz, 1GB mem).
>We have been having severe performance issues recently and moved our database
>volumes off onto a new disk...
You haven't cited the cause-effect case which would motivate such a change.
Are you certain that is the problem a
Since upgrading to TSM 5.1.6.2 on AIX 4.3.3 I have now noticed my cache hit
percentage drops below 98% every day. Reset bufpool brings it back to
100.00% but after 24 hours it will again be below 98%. While on TSM 5.1.5.2
it was rarely below 98.5%. Has anyone else seen this behavior?
Geoff Gill
TS
thanks I checked and it set for -1
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Allen Barth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: configuring a disk storage volume how
Paul, try this:
Under smit->user->change/show chariceristics of a u
if you didn't touch the /etc/security/limits file, you should. You just
have to edit it and change the fsize parameter to -1, in the default stanza
or just for the user who creates the file
Etienne GUILLAUMONT
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RGB Technologie
Parc d'Innovation, Bâtiment PYTHAGORE
11 Ru
Paul, try this:
Under smit->user->change/show chariceristics of a user for root, what is
the soft file size limit? Been bit by this before. Setting it to -1
(negative one) removes any filesize limitations.
Regards,
Al
"Coviello, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
I am trying not to do this. As I mentioned, I am testing IMPORT MERGE
FILESPACES. So, I have already performed BACKUPS to this server and was
trying to import ARCHIVEs.
If I have to, I will deleted everything, but I would like to know what is
going on and why ? If I have this problem with my pr
To all that responded my question : many, many thanks !!
TSM server is up and running again, and I'm (almost) dancing on my desk ...
For a first experience, it was a good one !
I love TSM ;-)
Wish you all a nice W.E.
Cheers.
Arnaud
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Arn
To All,
We will be migrating our 3 TSM servers (SP WinterHawk 2 nodes running AIX 4.3.3
ML10 w/ TSM servers 4.2.1.9) to
new p660 nodes running AIX 5.1. The TSM DB, rlogs, and storage pools are IBM
ESS based so I was intending on
"importing" the volume groups to the new nodes. Has anyone had any i
Hi Eric,
I have more or less the same situation as John dose.
We have a customer with Oracle 9.2 RAC on a 32Bit AIX 5.1 w/ HACMP ES.
They are using TSM 5.1.5 and I've installed TDPO 2.2.1 32bit which came
in the CD pack.
RMAN is unable to bind to the TDPO (SBT_TAPE).
What am I missing?
Best regar
No problem.
You will need to properly define the drive in your device config file (as
specified in your dsmserv.opt file) as a manual library with one drive in
it. And after the restore, you'll need to delete the drives and library from
the new TSM server instance and re-define your manual configu
Hi Zoltan!
Can you affort to delete all filespaces? If so, try DELETE FILESPACE
*
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 14:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hung Clie
yes we did enable this with the large file option. as far as the security,
I don't believe we touched that. below is our setting on that fs.
it's easier to manage 2 vs ?
thanks
Paul
File system name/bakpool9
NEW mount point
I am experiencing a strange issue on my test TSM server.
I am test IMPORT MERGE FILESPACES with 5.1.6.2 before I put 5.1.6.2 into
production (I really need the MERGE FILESPACES optionthings are being
held up without this feature, in trying to move some large nodes from one
TSM server to anothe
You could restore TSM DB to single DLT environment,I have done
this. After DB restored, you need to redefine Library, drive and path
in the current environment, ( Restore DB only remembers the environment
that DB was backup to, you need to do the brain wash).
Try it.
Arnaud,
Don't worry. Just messages from clients trying to connect to the TSM server.
Ruddy Stouder
Senior Technical Consultant
TSM Certified Consultant
I.R.I.S.
Rue du Bosquet 1
You have had some sessions attempting to connect to your TSM service whilst
the restore was taking place.
When ever I have run dsmserv interactively for maintenance, I get automated
sessions on various clients attempting to connect and I get exactly the same
errors.
If you know of any such clients
Hi Arnaud!
I don't know for sure but it looks like a client which tries to connect to
your TSM server while you are restoring the database.
Just to be sure, maybe you should contact support to verify this.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: PA
Eric, Ruddy
Many thanks for you help ! I managed it to restore the db successfully,
although I got some strange messages during restore, looking like :
ANR4639I Restored 334704 of 462160 database pages.
ANR4639I Restored 341664 of 462160 database pages.
ANRD smexec.c(976): Session NOT allowed
Hi John!
Is your AIX running in 64 bit mode? If so, you should use TDP for Oracle
5.1.5 instead of 2.2.1. You can find it at:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/
tivoli-data-protection/oracle_aix/v5150/
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Hi Arnaud!
Error 2 is an AIX return code meaning "No such file or directory".
This is probably because /tsmdb/log1 does not exist. Did you use the DSMFMT
command to create this file?
I also noted a difference in filename between the command you issued and the
error returned. I assume this is a typo
Hello,
You should use the dsmfmt command prior to dsmserv format
dsmfmt -db
Dsmfmt -log
Then, you follow by dsmserv format (or dsmserv loadformat) command and by
dsmserv restore db
Ruddy Stouder
Senior Technical Consultant
Hi List,
I had a call from one of our branches, telling me their TSM server crashed.
Unfortunately they had their log and db files sitted on the same unmirrored disk, so
basically everything is lost.
I'm now trying to initiate a DR scenario, but face a first problem : issuing "dsmserv
format 1
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:03:21PM +0100, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC wrote:
> Marcel, here the answer from one of my AIX colleague:
>
> There are different ways to make this work, one is:
>
> Through correct name resolution:
>
> - Check name resolution on tsm1 using command
> # host nms5
> -
Hello,
Did you modify the /etc/security/limits and did you create the fs with the
large file enabled option ? I suggest to create a fs with allocation group
size of 64 MB and 131072 bytes per i-node.
I don't know any other limitation for AIX to create big files, except the
limitation of something
54 matches
Mail list logo
