Re: tunables on AIX 5.2

You need to lower the maxclient setting first and then you can reduce maxperm. But as noted if your using jfs2 filesystems it is not a good idea to lower maxclient. -Original Message- From: Wheelock, Michael D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 5:38 PM To: [EMAIL

Fw: Does anyone install TSM 5.1.5 with Tape Autoloader 3607-16X ???

Thank for your answer. Can I ask you some more detail: a.. PATCH 5.1.7.1 is patch for autoloader IBM 360716X or patch for TSM 5.1.5 or TSM 5.1.7. I install TSM 5.2, Win2K SP3 but nothing change b.. Where I can download it ? c.. What does it mean: TSM will stop working with 3607-16x . TSM

Re: LTO Tape Drives

You have room for bar-code label on the cartridge. Actually from that space only part is machibe-readable (the bar-code area) and the rest can be used for your own purposes. Thus a solution might be (no warranty and other marketing stuff): print own bar-code labels. The specification is available

SV: SV: SV: Multiple backup of a file that doesn't change?

Hi Andy Comment as follows (marked with #); Flemming, The only possibilities I can think of: - someone ran a selective backup of the file (how have you verified that this is not the case?) # This is not the case, the only backup which has been performed on this server is a incremental

Re: Collocation from nocollocation

I understood the only options for collocation were on or off -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 July 2003 16:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Collocation from nocollocation With Collocation on, we had one small problem with the DB2 API. What

detail trace: erroneous output

Hello everyone! I'm still doing this tpoc, but this time it's with lto2. The client is SUN at 5.2, storage agent is 5.1.6.2 and the server is a sun solaris at 5.1.6.2. I have a detail trace on the client and I am receiving the following output. As you can see it is giving erroneous data for

Re: Fw: Does anyone install TSM 5.1.5 with Tape Autoloader 3607-16X ???

Hi, Reply for the questions : a) PATCH 5.1.7.1 is the TSM patch which will have Fix for the 3607-16x autoloader. and if you have already upgraded to TSM 5.2 you will need to download PATCH TSM 5.2.0.2 b) This will be available at Customer Download site for regular Patch dowloads. c) TSM does

Re: Collocation from nocollocation

Actually there are 3 options: No None Yes At the NODE level Filespace At the FILESPACE level Bill Boyer DSS, Inc. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tudor,Troy,VEVEY,GL-IS/IT Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003

Version 5 features

I could swear I read somewhere that TSM v5 added a feature to client schedules that allowed for Pre- and Post-schedule commands. I can't remember where I read that, nor can I find the information about it in the version we have installed now (just upgraded from 4.2.1.7 to 5.1.7.1). Does v5 allow

Re: Version 5 features

This is a feature that has been in the product for a lot longer than v4 or v5. See the PRESCHEDULECMD, PRENSCHEDULECMD, POSTSCHEDULECMD, and POSTNSCHEDULECMD options in the client manual. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes

select statement?

Hi, TSM 5.1.6.5 on windows 2K server. I'm trying to make a command script that will tell me how many filespaces have a BACKUP_END greater than 1 day. Then I want it to email those results to me. That way if a client stops backing up I'll get an email about it and go fix it. The emailing can be

Re: select statement?

Alex, For number of file spaces that haven't backed up: select count(*) from filespaces where backup_endcurrent_timestamp-1 day For total number of filespaces: select count(*) from filespaces For names of filespaces: select node_name, filespace_name from filespaces where

Re: select statement?

If you also want to capture file spaces that have no completion date, consider adding or backup_end is null to the where criterion, i.e.: ... where backup_end current_timestamp - 1 day or backup_end is null Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client

Re: select statement?

TSM rocks. And so do you guys. Thanks. Alex On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Andrew Raibeck wrote: If you also want to capture file spaces that have no completion date, consider adding or backup_end is null to the where criterion, i.e.: ... where backup_end current_timestamp - 1 day or backup_end is

ANR0102E dsalloc.c(980): Error 1 inserting row in table

Can anybody help. I getting the following errors in my activity log: 08/04/2003 12:45:13 ANR0102E dsalloc.c(980): Error 1 inserting row in table DS.Segments. This errors occurs at the start of a backup of some of my NT servers. 08/02/2003 08:05:56 ANR0102E dsalloc.c(980): Error 1

Re: copy storage pool implementation

Let uour D/R requirements drrive this. I have 3 archive copy pools and one backup pool. This worked out as easier to implement and monitor than a lot of co-located nodes. One archive pool is TDP; one is SAP/Oracle redo logs; and the third is all other oracle databases AND the second copy of the

New Version Release Information Link for TSM

Tivoli just announced the addition of a new Version Release Information (VRI) page for the TSM community. If your running Netscape or IE in the field, a word to the wise, load the new link (in blue below) from your highest speed connection first (to avoid a lengthy 1st time download), your

Journal-Based-bACKUP

Hi all, I do have problems, backing up one of our W2K-Nodes within the given timeframe of 10 Hours. It is a very big node ( 350 GB Filespace, 6 000 000 files, all files under one mountpoint) and we always make full incremental. I plan to use journal-based-backup to get it done in time. Does